Over the past decade, Taiwan and its vibrant civil society have excelled in public diplomacy. Campaigns such as “Taiwan Can Help” and “Chip in with Taiwan,” as well as Ministry of Foreign Affairs fellowships, international youth ambassador exchange programs, international forums hosted in Taiwan, visits by foreign delegations and influencers, and sporting and cultural events have brought Taiwan closer to the rest of the world.
Still, the successes have focused mainly on branding: selling Taiwan’s culture, openness and innovation to global audiences. They must continue, but they are no longer enough. The other core mission of public diplomacy — ie, policy advocacy and strategic narrative building — has fallen behind. On this front, Taiwan needs to step up.
Much of Taiwan’s policy-related outreach is top-down and Taiwan-centered. The bulk of advocacy work is done by diplomats and representative offices through traditional and new media, with events organized at academic institutions or think tanks. Those efforts matter, especially for alliance-building, but they largely reach sympathetic audiences. It seems that, too often, Taiwan ends up preaching to the choir.
The imbalance is especially clear in the fight against disinformation. Taiwan has poured significant resources into countering Chinese propaganda at home. By contrast, far less is being done to challenge the narratives in the international arena.
Meanwhile, Beijing is stepping up its narrative offensive abroad, branding Taiwan’s ruling party as “Nazis” and mischaracterizing World War II–era documents, while most of Taiwan’s counter-efforts remain focused at home. What is missing is scale, coordination and a true outward-facing civilian network capable of sustained advocacy abroad.
Israel offers a useful comparison. Hasbara (“explanation” in Hebrew) refers to Israel’s broad efforts to explain and defend its policies abroad. Whatever one thinks of its policies, Israel has built an infrastructure to mobilize Israeli and Jewish communities worldwide. Non-governmental organizations such as StandWithUs and programs like the Hasbara Fellowships train people on campuses and online, equipping them to engage skeptics, host debates and push back against hostile narratives.
Taiwan has no equivalent, yet it could be argued that it faces a far friendlier environment. Few people are inclined to attack its narrative. However, without a prepared network of credible, civilian messengers abroad, that advantage might be squandered.
Conflict over Taiwan’s future will not be confined to the Taiwan Strait. It will also be fought in classrooms, newsrooms and social media feeds. If Taiwan waits until a crisis to build its capacity in those arenas, it will be too late. Once tensions escalate, Beijing’s propaganda machine will go into overdrive and catching up will be much harder.
Taiwan must invest in strategic narrative building and policy advocacy. That means empowering grassroots actors abroad, supporting their initiatives and encouraging Taiwanese to confidently engage in debate.
Far from being a liability, such confrontational engagement can expose the weaknesses in Beijing’s claims and highlight Taiwan’s democratic values.
Taiwan’s story resonates worldwide, but stories do not tell themselves and narratives left uncontested are quickly filled by others. For Taiwan’s public diplomacy to work, Taiwanese at home and abroad must recognize that they have agency and a role to play. The government can help and facilitate, but it cannot substitute for committed people willing to speak up, organize and engage skeptical audiences.
It is this grassroots energy, supported but not directed from above, that will give Taiwan the credibility and resilience it needs in the narrative battle.
Mor Sobol is an associate professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
RSS