Communist organizations have been formed in 39 junior-high and high schools nationwide — all belonging to the Intercollegiate Communists Federation founded by members of Taipei Municipal Chien Kuo High School. The federation says its aim is to facilitate reform at schools and spread “correct communism,” and that it is not linked to the Chinese Communist Party.
It is good for young people to have ideals and aspirations, but they might not truly understand communism or are simply trying to be unconventional or appear avant-garde. Schools should be more proactive in guiding them.
Socialism, communism and communist parties are fundamentally different. Socialism is a theoretical proposition — a romantic expectation of an ideal society, communism is a more radical form of socialism that employs more extreme methods and communist parties emphasize atheism and class struggle.
Hopefully, the school groups are based on ideals and aspirations for social reform.
The Indonesian government prohibits citizens from advocating communism. It would never tolerate communist groups. History shows that communist parties exploited the passions and ideals of young people to sow division and conflict. The young people were used as scapegoats to help the parties seize power.
Moreover, the atheism and class struggle promoted by communist parties — although rooted in sociological conflict theory — overlooks the perspective of structural functionalism, which emphasizes how society’s interdependent parts operate together to maintain stability and equilibrium.
Academic discussions aim to analyze social phenomena and realities from multiple perspectives. However, communist parties move well beyond simple sociological analysis, pursuing explicit agendas of class struggle and the seizure of political power.
Communist parties are especially skilled at exploiting the kindness and innocence of those in democratic societies, manufacturing conflict and sowing division to successfully achieve their political goals. They can not be tolerated in schools.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences