US right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was shot dead on Sept. 10 during a public forum at Utah Valley University by an assassin firing from 183m away. He was 31. The suspect, Tyler Robinson, was arrested two days later after being turned in by his father and a friend. Surprisingly, Robinson himself came from a traditional conservative Republican family.
Differences of opinion are natural in a democracy. However, resorting to violence crosses a red line, and the taking of a young political figure on the rise is a tragedy. In stunned response, the US White House ordered the flag to be flown at half-staff at federal sites for four days, while more than 100,000 people at a right-wing rally in the UK mourned Kirk’s death.
The alleged assailant was born and raised in a democratic society, yet chose to silence opposing ideas with a gun. This should serve as a warning for democracies worldwide — Taiwan included.
Young people are increasingly getting their information from social media, which are notoriously difficult to control, as opposed to traditional print and broadcast media. These platforms are prone to political manipulation by public relations firms, troll farms, artificial intelligence (AI) and bots, often producing an insidious hybridization of “real” and “fake” news.
As soon as a story breaks, online provocateurs pounce. They use the names of real people and places to generate audio clips with voice actors or AI. However, the narratives they weave might divert from or run entirely counter to the real events. These “alternative” stories are spread in droves through automated accounts: Hordes of trolls flood comment sections with insults against political opponents, and sweeping numbers of auto-likes from bots overrun “the algorithm.”
This is how many young people get sucked in. They take to bullying political opponents online and are commended for it, gaining a sense of identity or camaraderie among the group. With that, the genie is out of the bottle; they gain an air of invincibility, and things escalate until many start to say and do things that defy common sense, rationality or even their humanity.
The young white camp supporters online pounding on the legislature doors are cut from this cloth. The scary reality is that parents might not know that their children are engaging in political bullying online. I saw one such incident of a student hurling abuse at a professor online, yet their parents believe them to be well-mannered and dutiful, returning home to vote to protect democracy come election day.
They have just as likely been brainwashed to the point of being unrecognizable, and might already be attacking you online as a “green commie,” maggot or toad. You might imagine them to be as docile as doves, but this disbelief is one that even the shooter’s parents once shared.
Reality must be faced. Parents and governments must act to curb disinformation, or risk losing a generation once expected to be honest, respectful, rational and informed.
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS