It is a rallying cry that every government can get behind. As artificial intelligence (AI) seeps into more facets of society — including critical industries such as defense, healthcare and financial services — countries want more control over the underlying technology.
There is also a fear that embedded values in the training data of foreign AI models can now spread at scale. This risks erasing cultural and linguistic nuances at a time when these tools are increasingly relied on by everyday citizens for search, drafting e-mails or completing homework assignments. These sensitivities are especially prominent across Asia, where even the names of major bodies of water are heatedly contested. (OpenAI’s ChatGPT still refers to the “Sea of Japan” instead of Seoul’s preferred “East Sea.”)
Many smaller nations are also wary of having to pick a side and further entrench the supremacy of US or Chinese tech giants, which could lock in their dominance for decades to come.
The dream is also a trap. Building foundation models, massive AI systems that are trained on enormous amounts of data, requires billions of US dollars, scarce chips and vast engineering talent. Only a handful of global firms have succeeded. For most countries, this moonshot risks becoming an expensive exercise in futility.
South Korea recently launched an ambitious initiative to develop a foundation model. A public-private partnership is sponsoring a competition among five local tech companies to create a domestic AI system that can compete with leading-edge rivals from the US and China. One official said in a statement that the goal of the project is, in part, to “secure Korea’s technological sovereignty in the AI era.” It is very much a gamble — most tech companies recognize the market reality that building a new foundation model from scratch that can take on the likes of OpenAI, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd or even DeepSeek is a near-impossible task. It is expected to only divert immense amounts of capital, computing resources and talent for a largely symbolic payoff.
Mongolia’s Egune AI illustrates the challenge more starkly. Founder and chief executive officer Badral Sanlig told me the project initially stemmed from frustrations over how foreign chatbots stumbled with the nuances of the local language. “Nobody helps us, because our market is too small,” he told me. “We had to build AI for Mongolia ourselves.”
Their first model, released in 2023, could write Mongolian poetry very well, Sanlig said, “but its general knowledge was almost zero.” The latest model, launched earlier this year, was much larger, 70 billion parameters, and had fewer issues with hallucinations. It can understand Mongolian text and culture as well as a local, Sanlig said, but its growth is restrained due to limited resources.
Accessing chips from Nvidia Corp has been very hard due to “our difficult neighbors,” Sanlig said.
Egune AI is working with some local customers, including Mongolia’s second-biggest commercial bank, but Sanlig said they are still trying to figure out how “to make profits, not losses,” and due to the limited resources, it has only amassed about 20,000 daily active users. ChatGPT, by comparison, has around 700 million weekly active users. Sanlig is confident that his company would have deep appeal within Mongolia, due to the pitch that the model is “located within our borders.” However, it is expected to be hard to move beyond a symbolic project that boosts national pride to a competitive player in the winner-takes-it-all industry.
The ultimate irony is that the biggest benefactor of all these scattered sovereign AI efforts is likely to be massive foreign firms, especially chipmakers such as Nvidia that stand to gain the most.
“The term ‘sovereign AI’ originated from Nvidia, possibly as a motive to sell more chips,” said James Landay, cofounder of the influential Stanford Institute for Human-centered Artificial Intelligence, in a recent interview with Korean media. Landay is correct: Massive orders for data-center buildouts from the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, which are also pursuing sovereign AI goals, can help offset lost sales from China for Nvidia, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts said in a note last week. Smaller nations’ quest for independence might end up strengthening the very firms they are seeking to escape.
A smarter strategy might be to channel resources not toward reinventing the foundational tech, but by focusing on the application layer. Building domain-specific tools in healthcare, finance or public services is also far more likely to deliver economic returns. Governments concerned about sovereignty would be better off concentrating on infrastructure at the deployment level: It matters less that an AI model was trained elsewhere if it can be run locally.
Ultimately, countries worried about being left behind in AI should focus more on diffusion. Historically, tech revolutions tell us that it is not necessarily the countries that develop a new general-purpose technology first who benefit the most, but those that deploy them most effectively. Nations that adapt their economies, industries and institutions to make the most of the tools are likely to capture the greatest gains.
When I asked Sanlig if he had any advice for smaller countries still trying to develop sovereign AI ecosystems, he sighed. “It is not so easy,” he said, “but it’s not impossible.”
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously, she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
RSS