Hours before unleashing a ground offensive against Gaza City on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu braced his country for a future of mounting economic isolation, urging it to become a “super Sparta” of the Middle East.
The future Netanyahu laid out for Israel, of a more militarized society, a partial autarky — or economically self-sufficient country — with limited trade options and relying increasingly on homemade production, has stirred up a backlash among Israelis who are ever more uneasy at the prospect of following him down the path to a pariah state.
On Tuesday, Israel took a few more steps along that path. As its tanks lumbered through the streets toward the center of Gaza City, a UN Commission of Inquiry published a detailed and damning report which concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
Illustration: Mountain People
On the same day, the European Commission prepared to discuss the potential suspension of part of the Israel-EU trade agreement, while the list of countries pledging to recognize Palestine continued to grow — as did the number of states threatening to boycott the Eurovision song contest if Israel took part.
On the news and on social media, there are daily stories of Israelis getting into scuffles or being assailed by hostile local people while on holiday abroad. For many Israelis, who have grown up thinking of themselves as an outpost of “the West” in the Middle East, all this is deeply troubling.
Stocks on the Tel Aviv stock market took an immediate dip after Netanyahu’s super Sparta speech, and the shekel fell against the US dollar. Those on the trading floors who knew their ancient history remembered that the Spartans fought hard — but lost disastrously.
“I don’t want to be Sparta,” Arnon Bar-David, the head of Israel’s biggest trade union federation, Histadrut, said at a union meeting on Tuesday. “We deserve peace. Israeli society is exhausted, and our status in the world is very bad.”
As the ground offensive began, a group of 80 prominent Israeli economists added up the country’s self-harm in billions of shekels. They warned that the attempt to conquer and destroy all of Gaza was “a threat to the security and economic resilience of the state of Israel, and could distance it from the group of developed countries.”
Netanyahu in his speech on Monday blamed foreigners for Israel’s increasing isolation, which he referred to as “a siege that is organized by a few states.”
“One is China, and the other is Qatar. And they are organizing an attack on Israel, legitimacy, in the social media of the Western world and the United States,” he said.
To the West, the threat was different, but equally pernicious, he added.
“Western Europe has large Islamist minorities. They’re vocal. Many of them are politically motivated. They align with Hamas, they align with Iran,” Netanyahu said. “They pressure the governments of western Europe, many of whom are kindly disposed to Israel, but they see that they are being overtaken, really, by campaigns of violent protest and constant intimidation.”
His remarks seemed to be a reference to the UK, France and Belgium, which are expected to recognize Palestine at the UN General Assembly later this month and have been increasingly critical of Israel over the Gaza war.
Netanyahu’s claim that western European governments were somehow in thrall to Islamism was an echo of conspiracy theories propagated by the growing far-right movements in those countries.
Netanyahu and his coalition have increasingly made common cause with the extreme right in Europe and the US, turning a blind eye to the anti-Semitic lineage of those movements.
As far as his domestic critics were concerned, Netanyahu’s heightened oratory was no more than a characteristic refusal to take responsibility for the consequences of his government’s actions.
One commenter, Sever Plocker, writing in the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper and using a biblical reference, said that Netanyahu’s policies “truly are leading Israel straight into the tragic situation of a ‘people who shall dwell alone,’ cut off from the developed western world, a country that other nations don’t want to go anywhere near, visit, host or much less trade with.”
The Democrats leader Yair Golan voiced a widespread suspicion in Israel that Netanyahu was determined to keep Israel steeped in war, as a means of warding off early elections, remaining as prime minister and staying out of jail.
At a hearing of his trial on corruption charges on Tuesday, Netanyahu did indeed use the ground offensive as an argument to limit his attendance in court.
Netanyahu’s message to citizens ahead of the Jewish new year was: “In order to keep my seat, I need eternal war and isolation. And you will sacrifice the country, the economy, your children’s future and your relationship with the world,” Golan said.
For all the criticism Netanyahu has faced over the past two years of warfare, he has defied expectations by staying in power. Support from Washington — reluctantly from former US president Joe Biden and more indiscriminately from US President Donald Trump — has helped him stay in place. The Gaza City ground offensive followed a green light delivered in person by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday, when he vowed “unwavering” support to eliminate Hamas.
Meanwhile, in domestic politics the Orthodox and national religious electorates have risen in importance, just as Israel’s old secular, technocratic elites have faded. Netanyahu’s coalition partners on the far right welcome the siege mentality he is seeking to instill, as it wards off the prospect of compromise and foreign influence that would inhibit the drive toward a greater Israel built on the ruins of the Palestinian territories.
Right-wing commentator and journalist Amihai Attali said it was time for Israelis to realize they were in a religious war to the death, in which some economic hardship was a small price to pay.
“Yes, this will take longer than we have grown accustomed to fighting; yes, this will be more exhausting and will heavily tax our national and social resources,” Attali wrote in the Yedioth Ahronoth. “We have no option but to wield our swords.”
“How romantic to fantasize about the heroic and ascetic Spartans, a mere few hundred of whom successfully fought a powerful Persian army. The problem is that Sparta was annihilated,” veteran columnist Ben Caspit wrote in the center-right Maariv newspaper. “It lost and disappeared.”
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS