As the new academic year begins in Hong Kong, the University of Hong Kong (HKU) — widely regarded as the territory’s most prestigious institution — marked the first day of classes on Monday last week with an astonishing notice: A sign taped to a library trash bin read: “Please do not defecate in the trash can.”
Founded in 1911, the university had never seen anything like it. The announcement instantly sparked a firestorm.
The signage was first exposed by online news outlet HK01, which has also sent a letter to the university seeking an explanation on the matter. The university’s response seemed to imply silent acquiescence and an inclination to steer clear of further discussion.
The notice is printed in traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese and English — an ostensibly egalitarian gesture that strategically avoids charges of racial discrimination — but it only added fuel to the fire.
One person wrote online: “Use traditional Chinese or English by all means, but please don’t use simplified characters to imply that the perpetrator was someone from the Chinese mainland.”
Most online users assume the culprit to be a Chinese from the mainland. Considering Hong Kongers and mainland Chinese seem to attribute cultural differences to genetic varieties in their respective communities, maybe the only solution would be to conduct DNA testing on the feces.
After all, Chinese call themselves the “descendants of the Yan and Yellow Emperor” (炎黃子孫), Hong Kongers are derisively considered “remnants of southern barbarians” (南蠻餘孽), while Westerners are gweilo, a derogatory term loosely translated as “foreign devil.” Case closed, they claim, with little need for forensic nuance.
Hong Kong welcomes many overseas talents, including those from the mainland. However, investigators are now uncovering a counterfeit industry focused on creating fraudulent academic degrees, with the manufacturing bridging across the mainland and Hong Kong.
Although Hong Kongers still make up the bulk of the university body, the surge in mainland enrollees — particularly among research postgraduate students — is telling. Non-locals account for 87.1 percent of them and 72.9 percent of postgraduate students.
No wonder Hong Kongers are not taking this “crap” sitting down, the distinction between “us” and “them” becoming ever more important. Fortunately — or perhaps conveniently — the vice chancellor and pro-vice chancellor are from mainland China, making the matter less delicate to handle internally.
Conversely, perhaps it was a tourist’s doing. Hong Kong, eager to expand its tourism economy, remains a magnet for mainland visitors. When nature calls, such as in the library — where bathrooms are apparently hard to find — one would instinctively resort to relieving themselves at the nearest trash can. At least this avenue avoids public peeing or pooping. Which, in a twisted way, would then preserve the spirit of “Chinese civilization.” After all, incidents such as a tourist allowing their child to pee in a bottle by a dining table occur even at Din Tai Fung in Taiwan.
Ironically, the Chinese Communist Party had loudly denounced Shanghai-born Japanese Legislator Hei Seki (石平) — who is already a naturalized citizen in Japan — as a “21st century Hanjian” (漢奸), a pejorative term for those deemed traitors to the Chinese state and the Han Chinese identity.
Following this logic, could a university restroom become a site where defecation is pragmatically adapted to circumstances? Is this not, as they claim, a uniquely communist-educated expression of civilization?
One person online wrote: “One dump in HKU — and the integration is with us. The SAR [Special Administrative Region] is truly returned; westernization must end.”
The Hong Kong government’s urgings for Hong Kong-China integration triggered the comment.
Similarly, Beijing continues to urge Taipei to “integrate” with it through cognitive warfare. Could Taiwanese truly “integrate” with such a communist civilization? Would they be able to align with the behavior of those who smuggle bulks of Taiwanese insurance-covered medicines back to China, consigning our welfare system to overload? Standing firmly with Taiwanese sovereignty is, for now, the most effective antidote to this campaign of unification.
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Suminski
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we
RSS