As the new academic year begins in Hong Kong, the University of Hong Kong (HKU) — widely regarded as the territory’s most prestigious institution — marked the first day of classes on Monday last week with an astonishing notice: A sign taped to a library trash bin read: “Please do not defecate in the trash can.”
Founded in 1911, the university had never seen anything like it. The announcement instantly sparked a firestorm.
The signage was first exposed by online news outlet HK01, which has also sent a letter to the university seeking an explanation on the matter. The university’s response seemed to imply silent acquiescence and an inclination to steer clear of further discussion.
The notice is printed in traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese and English — an ostensibly egalitarian gesture that strategically avoids charges of racial discrimination — but it only added fuel to the fire.
One person wrote online: “Use traditional Chinese or English by all means, but please don’t use simplified characters to imply that the perpetrator was someone from the Chinese mainland.”
Most online users assume the culprit to be a Chinese from the mainland. Considering Hong Kongers and mainland Chinese seem to attribute cultural differences to genetic varieties in their respective communities, maybe the only solution would be to conduct DNA testing on the feces.
After all, Chinese call themselves the “descendants of the Yan and Yellow Emperor” (炎黃子孫), Hong Kongers are derisively considered “remnants of southern barbarians” (南蠻餘孽), while Westerners are gweilo, a derogatory term loosely translated as “foreign devil.” Case closed, they claim, with little need for forensic nuance.
Hong Kong welcomes many overseas talents, including those from the mainland. However, investigators are now uncovering a counterfeit industry focused on creating fraudulent academic degrees, with the manufacturing bridging across the mainland and Hong Kong.
Although Hong Kongers still make up the bulk of the university body, the surge in mainland enrollees — particularly among research postgraduate students — is telling. Non-locals account for 87.1 percent of them and 72.9 percent of postgraduate students.
No wonder Hong Kongers are not taking this “crap” sitting down, the distinction between “us” and “them” becoming ever more important. Fortunately — or perhaps conveniently — the vice chancellor and pro-vice chancellor are from mainland China, making the matter less delicate to handle internally.
Conversely, perhaps it was a tourist’s doing. Hong Kong, eager to expand its tourism economy, remains a magnet for mainland visitors. When nature calls, such as in the library — where bathrooms are apparently hard to find — one would instinctively resort to relieving themselves at the nearest trash can. At least this avenue avoids public peeing or pooping. Which, in a twisted way, would then preserve the spirit of “Chinese civilization.” After all, incidents such as a tourist allowing their child to pee in a bottle by a dining table occur even at Din Tai Fung in Taiwan.
Ironically, the Chinese Communist Party had loudly denounced Shanghai-born Japanese Legislator Hei Seki (石平) — who is already a naturalized citizen in Japan — as a “21st century Hanjian” (漢奸), a pejorative term for those deemed traitors to the Chinese state and the Han Chinese identity.
Following this logic, could a university restroom become a site where defecation is pragmatically adapted to circumstances? Is this not, as they claim, a uniquely communist-educated expression of civilization?
One person online wrote: “One dump in HKU — and the integration is with us. The SAR [Special Administrative Region] is truly returned; westernization must end.”
The Hong Kong government’s urgings for Hong Kong-China integration triggered the comment.
Similarly, Beijing continues to urge Taipei to “integrate” with it through cognitive warfare. Could Taiwanese truly “integrate” with such a communist civilization? Would they be able to align with the behavior of those who smuggle bulks of Taiwanese insurance-covered medicines back to China, consigning our welfare system to overload? Standing firmly with Taiwanese sovereignty is, for now, the most effective antidote to this campaign of unification.
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Suminski
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS