Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative activist and close ally of US President Donald Trump, was shot and killed on Wednesday while giving a speech at Utah Valley University in Orem.
Perhaps, more than even firearms, it is social media algorithms that encourage violence.
Many academics have observed that, as social media algorithms become increasingly sophisticated, people have grown more self-centered and intolerant. In his 2019 book Upheaval: How Nations Cope With Crisis and Change, Jared Diamond recalls that in the 1990s, he could share a meal with his intellectual opponents. However, today, even delivering a speech at a university event requires security guards. Debates on university campuses increasingly escalate into physical confrontations. However, while most involve physical altercations, they rarely shock the public like Kirk’s shooting has.
Although civilians in Taiwan cannot legally possess firearms like they can in the US, vigilance is still necessary.
If, like me, you come from the early generation of Taiwanese blogging and frequented Wretch (無名小站), previously Taiwan’s leading social networking Web site, you likely sense how hostile the tone of online discourse has become. Many of those who lived during the Martial Law era stood side-by-side — whether they backed unification or independence — to resist Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) dictatorship. Figures like author, politician and historian Li Ao (李敖), democracy advocate Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) and former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) collaborated through platforms such as the Freedom Era Weekly (自由時代). Today, political affiliation, identity, or even liking different influencers can be enough to set people at odds.
Social media allow people to make unfavorable opinions disappear with the flick of a finger, building an echo chamber that does nothing but like our posts and validate us. This can become second nature. When they encounter someone in person with a different viewpoint, they might find them intolerable.
This could be the deeper, long-term context behind Kirk’s tragic death.
Even without firearms, Taiwan’s university campuses are not devoid of danger — there could be knives, gasoline, even corrosive chemicals like aqua regia. Given this, it is imperative that families, schools and the government implement reasonable controls over children’s and adolescents’ use of digital devices. The harm social media algorithms pose to people’s health might rival that of tobacco and alcohol.
Jimway Chang has a master’s degree in history from National Tsing Hua University and is a history teacher at a high school.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS