The fire that broke out at the Hsinta Power Plant in Kaohsiung on Tuesday has once again brought Taiwan’s energy issues into the spotlight. Although there were fortunately no casualties, Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai’s (陳其邁) response to the incident exposed a long-standing structural contradiction: While Kaohsiung has supplied a large portion of Taiwan’s electricity for many years, it simultaneously bears the brunt of pollution, industrial safety risks and environmental impacts.
While not without flaws, Chen’s line of questioning was not entirely unreasonable.
Transitioning from coal to gas is an international trend steering the direction of Taiwan’s energy transformation. Coal is an energy source with high carbon emissions and although natural gas is not an ideal solution, it could help reduce emissions and overall pollution. Kaohsiung hopes to move away from coal-fired power to ease the burden it has placed on local residents — a demand that appears to be reasonable and fit within the framework of environmental justice.
However, the path to energy transition is far longer and more complex than slogans suggest. Natural gas largely relies on imports — therefore the stability of its supply and price is heavily influenced by international market fluctuations. Moreover, liquefied natural gas terminals and gas transmission facilities often face environmental impact assessments and trigger local opposition.
Chen’s assertion that each regions in Taiwan should be responsible for producing the electricity it consumes is more of a lofty ideal than a practical policy. The reality is that, while northern Taiwan has massive electricity demand, its high population density and limited available land make it difficult to find suitable sites for new power plants — not to mention strong resistance from local residents.
Taiwan’s power grid is designed for nationwide distribution, so it is not feasible to say that power should be generated where it is used.
This contradiction is not unique to Taiwan, but a global phenomenon. During its own energy transition, Germany also faced opposition to transmitting electricity produced in the north to the south, and worked vigorously to develop decentralized renewable energy systems.
That being said, Taiwan’s conditions differ from that of Germany. The plausibility of rooftop solar panels is limited by factors such as typhoons and urban infrastructure, while onshore wind farms face the challenges of limited land and local resistance.
Relying solely on weather-dependent renewables is not enough to support industrial and everyday energy needs. For Taiwan, a more viable direction would be to combine the use of small-scale gas-fired units, renewable energy and energy storage systems to gradually develop regional microgrids — a more decentralized and resilient approach that could ease the burden on southern Taiwan while reducing the power grid’s dependence on single large power plants.
Chen’s appeal not only reflects the long held grievances of Kaohsiung residents, but also highlights the daunting challenges of Taiwan’s energy transition.
The nation needs more than rhetoric about energy alternatives — it needs forward-looking planning and a more pragmatic nationwide consensus.
Only by reshaping the energy landscape based on the principles of fairness and resilience can Taiwan avoid repeating the mistake of forcing a single region to bear excessive risks.
Such measures are essential for the nation to maintain its footing amid worldwide decarbonization efforts and surging industrial competition.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS