In November 2022, we warned that allowing Russia’s war on Ukraine to become a frozen conflict would mean defeat for Ukraine and the democratic world. Sadly, this point is often lost. Those covering the issue in the media or pursuing political efforts to contain the war have failed to recognize the bigger picture: Russia is already waging war on the West by other means — including through political interference, disinformation and sabotage.
The Kremlin has shown no genuine interest in any peace or ceasefire in the war it started, because its goals have not changed. It wants to destroy Ukraine as a state and Ukrainian as a national identity. That is why Russian state-owned media continue to publish commentaries with headlines such as: “There is no other way out. No one should stay alive in Ukraine.”
In the face of such genocidal ambitions, even ceding Ukrainian territory would not end the war.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s constant talk of negotiations has one purpose: to reduce international support for Ukraine and demobilize Ukrainian society by creating false hopes. If people start to believe there could soon be a ceasefire, they would also start to wonder whether Ukraine really needs more weapons deliveries, or whether they should bother joining the Ukrainian army.
It should be obvious by now that muddying the water is Putin’s only goal in holding out hope for diplomacy. So far this year, an official Ukrainian delegation has met with an official Russian delegation three times in Istanbul, Turkey; US President Donald Trump has called Putin more than a dozen times and rolled out a red carpet for him in Alaska; and Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, a real-estate developer with no diplomatic experience, has paid regular visits — usually relying on a Kremlin-supplied translator and with no US official taking notes — to Moscow.
The results speak for themselves. Russia continues to shell Ukrainian cities and step up its attacks on the front lines. It is increasing military production, mobilizing more men to become cannon fodder, and receiving more weapons and personnel from North Korea. It also continues to meddle in European elections. If it can install more illiberal Russophiles such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, it can weaken Western democracies and reduce support for Ukraine.
The smoke screen of “negotiations” should fool no one. Russia, supported by China, North Korea and Iran, would continue its military aggression against Ukraine. When China and Russia determine that NATO has been sufficiently weakened, they would attack other countries. The more concessions Putin gets such as lifting some sanctions or delaying a shipment of weapons bound for Ukraine, the sooner this would happen.
With the shameful Alaska summit, Putin came one step closer to achieving his dream of a “Yalta 2,” where Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Trump and he carve the world into spheres of influence. While all the empty talk continues, the Ukrainians who remain in the occupied territories must bear the unbearable. Freedom House, in its effort to quantify the results of Russia’s barbaric rule, has assigned these territories a value of minus-1 on its 100-point index of rights and civil liberties.
Among its many atrocities, Russian forces have brutalized and murdered Ukrainian journalists who try to investigate torture, unlawful detentions and other crimes against humanity in the occupied territories. Incompetent and corrupt occupation authorities have left basic infrastructure to decay. An escalating water crisis has hit the populations in Donetsk and Mariupol, and abandoned coal mines are poisoning ground water and threatening to make vast swaths of territory uninhabitable. This zone of lawlessness and ecological catastrophe would only expand if Ukraine is forced to cede more land to Russia.
Putin’s ultimate goal is to overturn the post-Cold War international order, and this process has already started. The only path to stability and security now is for Russia to be soundly defeated in Ukraine. There would be no lasting peace until its leaders are brought to justice, and until its people are made to understand that they cannot simply murder others on a tyrant’s whim.
Those who think it is impossible to defeat Russia should recall that the Soviet Union was far more powerful than Putin’s wannabe empire, and yet it lost in Afghanistan in 1989 and lost the first Chechen War in 1996. More recently, Russia failed to secure its allies in Iran and Syria when they came under attack. On the contrary, when the Kremlin stopped its “peacekeeping” efforts, Armenia and Azerbaijan were able to sign a peace agreement. In these latter cases, deployments to Ukraine had stretched Russia’s military resources too thin. Moreover, there are many signs that the Russian war economy is running out of steam.
Unfortunately, Trump is hardly the only one who wants to make land concessions at Ukraine’s expense in the hopes of restoring the old “status quo.” Everyone who favors this approach must realize that there can be no going back.
We are approaching the point with only two options: The first is for Russia to be defeated, which requires that the West impose harsher sanctions and meet Ukraine’s need for weapons. The second is a defeat for democracy, fulfilling former Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin’s and Putin’s dream of subduing Europe. In the first scenario, Europeans would need to sacrifice some of their welfare. In the second, they would lose it all.
Yuriy Gorodnichenko is professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley. Mats Marcusson is a retired European Commission official. Ilona Sologoub is editor of VoxUkraine.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several