In its third term of occupying the Executive Yuan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has grown dull and lost the power to shape public discourse. The groups that initiated the mass recall movement appeared to be on track to a sweeping victory after getting 32 candidates on recall ballots. By the end of last week, all of the targeted candidates had survived.
By contrast, about 100 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) staff members have been detained or indicted for the forgery of signatures on recall petitions. None of the civil society groups have been accused of such behavior.
Meanwhile, the KMT exhausted funds meant for the next major election to combat the recalls, further draining its strength. What comes next remains uncertain.
The total loss in the mass recall’s final stage was likely a result of issues in language and messaging. The defeat came because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party camps were backed by professional “united front” units, while the DPP side expected to gain support from volunteers — an inferior plan.
What is more is that there has been no ban on Xiaohongshu (also known as RedNote) or Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), nor did the DPP deploy any core force to counter the “united front” work. The entirety of society is seemingly defenseless against disinformation, and young people have been completely brainwashed. Given the circumstances, it would have been strange if the recall movement had not failed.
The DPP still does not understand the new media culture war, nor how to deal with it. It is time for the party to wake up and take a look at the online discourse surrounding elections, which has overwhelmingly become a platform for the CCP’s “united front” efforts.
From the smearing of then-minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) during the COVID-19 pandemic to now, nothing has changed. If the DPP does not change course, it would continue to face defeats.
Throughout the recall movement, the outstanding performance of civil society groups and volunteers far surpassed that of the DPP. Unyielding, they moved from the streets to the Internet, bringing the recall initiative to the online battlefield. Citizens used short voice clips, Facebook and YouTube comment sections, to counter the smears, insults and curses of Chinese actors, online trolls and bots, attempting to reclaim their voice and restore balance to the online ecosystem. The public’s spirit is still alive and well — what is concerning is that the ruling party could cause it to die.
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS