In its third term of occupying the Executive Yuan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has grown dull and lost the power to shape public discourse. The groups that initiated the mass recall movement appeared to be on track to a sweeping victory after getting 32 candidates on recall ballots. By the end of last week, all of the targeted candidates had survived.
By contrast, about 100 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) staff members have been detained or indicted for the forgery of signatures on recall petitions. None of the civil society groups have been accused of such behavior.
Meanwhile, the KMT exhausted funds meant for the next major election to combat the recalls, further draining its strength. What comes next remains uncertain.
The total loss in the mass recall’s final stage was likely a result of issues in language and messaging. The defeat came because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party camps were backed by professional “united front” units, while the DPP side expected to gain support from volunteers — an inferior plan.
What is more is that there has been no ban on Xiaohongshu (also known as RedNote) or Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), nor did the DPP deploy any core force to counter the “united front” work. The entirety of society is seemingly defenseless against disinformation, and young people have been completely brainwashed. Given the circumstances, it would have been strange if the recall movement had not failed.
The DPP still does not understand the new media culture war, nor how to deal with it. It is time for the party to wake up and take a look at the online discourse surrounding elections, which has overwhelmingly become a platform for the CCP’s “united front” efforts.
From the smearing of then-minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) during the COVID-19 pandemic to now, nothing has changed. If the DPP does not change course, it would continue to face defeats.
Throughout the recall movement, the outstanding performance of civil society groups and volunteers far surpassed that of the DPP. Unyielding, they moved from the streets to the Internet, bringing the recall initiative to the online battlefield. Citizens used short voice clips, Facebook and YouTube comment sections, to counter the smears, insults and curses of Chinese actors, online trolls and bots, attempting to reclaim their voice and restore balance to the online ecosystem. The public’s spirit is still alive and well — what is concerning is that the ruling party could cause it to die.
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS