In its third term of occupying the Executive Yuan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has grown dull and lost the power to shape public discourse. The groups that initiated the mass recall movement appeared to be on track to a sweeping victory after getting 32 candidates on recall ballots. By the end of last week, all of the targeted candidates had survived.
By contrast, about 100 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) staff members have been detained or indicted for the forgery of signatures on recall petitions. None of the civil society groups have been accused of such behavior.
Meanwhile, the KMT exhausted funds meant for the next major election to combat the recalls, further draining its strength. What comes next remains uncertain.
The total loss in the mass recall’s final stage was likely a result of issues in language and messaging. The defeat came because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party camps were backed by professional “united front” units, while the DPP side expected to gain support from volunteers — an inferior plan.
What is more is that there has been no ban on Xiaohongshu (also known as RedNote) or Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), nor did the DPP deploy any core force to counter the “united front” work. The entirety of society is seemingly defenseless against disinformation, and young people have been completely brainwashed. Given the circumstances, it would have been strange if the recall movement had not failed.
The DPP still does not understand the new media culture war, nor how to deal with it. It is time for the party to wake up and take a look at the online discourse surrounding elections, which has overwhelmingly become a platform for the CCP’s “united front” efforts.
From the smearing of then-minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) during the COVID-19 pandemic to now, nothing has changed. If the DPP does not change course, it would continue to face defeats.
Throughout the recall movement, the outstanding performance of civil society groups and volunteers far surpassed that of the DPP. Unyielding, they moved from the streets to the Internet, bringing the recall initiative to the online battlefield. Citizens used short voice clips, Facebook and YouTube comment sections, to counter the smears, insults and curses of Chinese actors, online trolls and bots, attempting to reclaim their voice and restore balance to the online ecosystem. The public’s spirit is still alive and well — what is concerning is that the ruling party could cause it to die.
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS