In Washington’s conservative policy circles, Taiwan’s standing has become a hot topic — and not always flattering. The line is that, in US President Donald Trump’s second term, Taipei has “played the wrong card.” The criticism goes well beyond handshake etiquette or missed calls, targeting strategic areas like trade, cultural values and defense — as if Taiwan had gone overnight from “strategic partner” to “that friend who always needs a ride, but never chips in for gas.”
On the surface, this sounds like a major diplomatic misstep, but zoom out and it is clear that the picture is more complex. The political climate has shifted everywhere, not just in Taipei. From NATO to Tokyo and Seoul, Trump 2.0 has meant repricing alliances: defense quotas, trade terms and autonomy are all back on the table. Even first-term favorites are relearning his transactional style. Taiwan must adjust, but blaming the chill solely on partisan preference oversimplifies the reality.
Critics also point to a values gap with “MAGA” proponents on gender equality, environmental protection and diversity. True — Taiwan’s human rights diplomacy aligns neatly with traditional Democrat approaches, but these values are homegrown, not imported, built through decades of democratization. Flipping them overnight to please MAGA conservatives would damage Taiwan’s image and fracture domestic consensus.
Economics is another sore spot: tariffs on US farm goods and automobiles, tight financial market access, and constraining rules on investment. These are “anti-business” red flags to some. Yet Trump’s economic nationalism spares no one — Canada, the EU and Japan have all faced similar demands. For Taiwan, high tariffs tie into food safety and sustainable rural livelihoods; and market openings need strong regulatory safeguards. The energy transition is not just a weekend home-improvement job. Concessions must be calculated by return, not by press release. Otherwise, it is like leaping off the high dive before realizing (fatally) the pool is half-drained.
On defense, a complaint is that Taiwan’s spending lags behind, with Israel’s 10 percent of GDP often cited as a benchmark, but that ignores geography and strategy. Taiwan is an island betting on asymmetric defense, while Israel has multiple land borders. Taiwan has raised budgets, modernized reserves, deployed more missiles and invested heavily in drones. It might not meet every MAGA wish list, but it is far from doing nothing.
This is not a “loss,” so much as a repositioning in a polarized Washington. The goal is not to pick a side, but to keep chips on both, widening engagement beyond handshake tours to include the US Congress, as well as governors, think tanks and industry leaders from both parties.
Dealing with Trump’s US requires more than upbeat press releases about “smooth communication” between the two countries. Taiwan must show its cards in ways the other side can count — concrete proposals on defense, agriculture and investment; common ground on religious freedom, family values and a shared skepticism of authoritarianism. At home, the public deserves the full forecast.
The Taiwan-US dynamic is like a poker tournament in which a five-time world champion has entered the game on the last day — and this one plays fast, loud, aggressively and with a bigger chip stack. The strategy that won your last hand might flop here. It is not about whether your hand looks good, but whether you know your chip count — and how to stay in long enough to catch the right card. Trump’s return is a challenge and an opportunity. Read the table, adjust your play and be ready with a new strategy when you lean in to say: “Deal me in.”
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor at Tamkang University.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times