In Washington’s conservative policy circles, Taiwan’s standing has become a hot topic — and not always flattering. The line is that, in US President Donald Trump’s second term, Taipei has “played the wrong card.” The criticism goes well beyond handshake etiquette or missed calls, targeting strategic areas like trade, cultural values and defense — as if Taiwan had gone overnight from “strategic partner” to “that friend who always needs a ride, but never chips in for gas.”
On the surface, this sounds like a major diplomatic misstep, but zoom out and it is clear that the picture is more complex. The political climate has shifted everywhere, not just in Taipei. From NATO to Tokyo and Seoul, Trump 2.0 has meant repricing alliances: defense quotas, trade terms and autonomy are all back on the table. Even first-term favorites are relearning his transactional style. Taiwan must adjust, but blaming the chill solely on partisan preference oversimplifies the reality.
Critics also point to a values gap with “MAGA” proponents on gender equality, environmental protection and diversity. True — Taiwan’s human rights diplomacy aligns neatly with traditional Democrat approaches, but these values are homegrown, not imported, built through decades of democratization. Flipping them overnight to please MAGA conservatives would damage Taiwan’s image and fracture domestic consensus.
Economics is another sore spot: tariffs on US farm goods and automobiles, tight financial market access, and constraining rules on investment. These are “anti-business” red flags to some. Yet Trump’s economic nationalism spares no one — Canada, the EU and Japan have all faced similar demands. For Taiwan, high tariffs tie into food safety and sustainable rural livelihoods; and market openings need strong regulatory safeguards. The energy transition is not just a weekend home-improvement job. Concessions must be calculated by return, not by press release. Otherwise, it is like leaping off the high dive before realizing (fatally) the pool is half-drained.
On defense, a complaint is that Taiwan’s spending lags behind, with Israel’s 10 percent of GDP often cited as a benchmark, but that ignores geography and strategy. Taiwan is an island betting on asymmetric defense, while Israel has multiple land borders. Taiwan has raised budgets, modernized reserves, deployed more missiles and invested heavily in drones. It might not meet every MAGA wish list, but it is far from doing nothing.
This is not a “loss,” so much as a repositioning in a polarized Washington. The goal is not to pick a side, but to keep chips on both, widening engagement beyond handshake tours to include the US Congress, as well as governors, think tanks and industry leaders from both parties.
Dealing with Trump’s US requires more than upbeat press releases about “smooth communication” between the two countries. Taiwan must show its cards in ways the other side can count — concrete proposals on defense, agriculture and investment; common ground on religious freedom, family values and a shared skepticism of authoritarianism. At home, the public deserves the full forecast.
The Taiwan-US dynamic is like a poker tournament in which a five-time world champion has entered the game on the last day — and this one plays fast, loud, aggressively and with a bigger chip stack. The strategy that won your last hand might flop here. It is not about whether your hand looks good, but whether you know your chip count — and how to stay in long enough to catch the right card. Trump’s return is a challenge and an opportunity. Read the table, adjust your play and be ready with a new strategy when you lean in to say: “Deal me in.”
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor at Tamkang University.
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
RSS