Australia’s affordable housing push has arrived in the wealthy Sydney suburb of Mosman, where new planning laws are challenging long-standing resistance to development in the leafy area known for mansions and sweeping harbor views.
State authorities in Sydney and Melbourne — Australia’s two biggest cities — are stripping some planning powers from suburban councils, including ones like Mosman that have created national headlines over opposition to new housing from older, wealthier constituents.
The broad policy shift comes as political deference to NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) sentiment gives way to demands for more housing from younger voters whose electoral heft now rivals the traditionally powerful baby boomer bloc.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In Mosman, there are fears the reforms will ultimately alter the character of the suburb, which boasts natural beauty, high-end stores and a median house price of more than A$5 million (US$3.23 million).
“We’re surrounded by water with harbor views, so there are people who are going to have literally millions of dollars knocked off the value of their property because their view will be blocked,” said Simon Menzies, an elected Mosman councillor of 20 years.
The new laws are designed to allow more housing at key transport and commercial hubs and give the New South Wales state government powers to override council objections to large developments.
Similar rules to fast-track three-story apartment blocks have been introduced in Melbourne’s state of Victoria.
Five kilometres from Mosman, a new metro line in the suburb of Crows Nest means the state government has given a 22-story apartment building the green light, overriding years-long council opposition.
In Mosman, objections from neighbors to one such proposal are already pouring in, but the council said there is little they can do about it.
The government intervention tracks a broader international trend, particularly in high-demand markets like London and California, where soaring costs have hampered home ownership for young people.
Sydney’s house prices have surged more than 30 percent over the past five years, outpacing wage growth.
New South Wales Premier Chris Minns warns that Sydney, the state’s capital, risks becoming “a city with no grandchildren.”
It is already the second-most unaffordable city globally after Hong Kong.
“Their narrative is get out of our way. We want to build as many homes as possible to enable young Sydney residents to buy their homes,” said Kos Samaras, director at polling firm Redbridge. “I think the political ballast that was there to protect the interests of homeowners is now gone.”
Australia’s sprawling cities are among the world’s least densely populated and historically built to accommodate suburban aspirations of owning detached houses with large backyards, not apartment living.
That has shifted in recent decades, particularly as waves of immigrants and students settle in high-rises around public transport hubs.
The latest housing push is designed to fill in the “missing middle” — townhouses, terraces and low-rise residential apartments, which typically meet opposition from councils.
Research from the Productivity Commission showed that industry is only building half as many homes at a time compared with 30 years ago, hampered in part by approval processes that can stretch more than a decade.
Australian Minister for Housing Clare O’Neil said that 40 years of state, local and federal government regulations have created an impenetrable “wall of bureaucracy” for anyone trying to build a house.
“I think we’ve reached a tipping point here where the majority of our population are actually in housing distress themselves or are deeply concerned about the people that they know, especially that younger generation,” O’Neil told Reuters.
After her party’s landslide victory in the May federal election, O’Neil is pledging “bigger and bolder” policies.
A productivity roundtable this month presents an opportunity to remove some of those requirements, she added.
The turnaround might have already started.
Building approvals of apartments surged almost 90 percent in the first half of the year, driven by a 33 percent jump in New South Wales. Construction jobs jumped 20 percent in the three months to May and construction starts of higher-density homes rose more than 20 percent in the first quarter.
Peter Tulip, chief economist at the Centre for Independent Studies, expects a substantial step-up in construction in New South Wales and Victoria from 2026 onward.
However, supply will still struggle to meet demand, pushing prices higher. Indeed, national home prices have hit fresh records each month, fueled by rate cuts and the expectations of more to come.
Justin Simon, chair of housing advocacy group Sydney YIMBY, said that Mosman had great amenity and was exactly the sort of place where new housing was needed.
“There is no way an ordinary person, essential workers, cleaners, nurses or anyone else could ever afford to live in Mosman, and that is because for decades they have stopped new homes being built and we need to turn that around,” he said.
Some Mosman property owners impacted by policy changes are joining forces to sell entire blocks to developers, capitalizing on strong demand for higher-density housing in the harborside suburb.
The first application under the new policy, for example, is a six-story residential building near the main town center, comprising 29 dwellings, most of which are the family-sized three-bedroom units Sydney lacks.
Objections cited issues such as traffic, road safety, parking and privacy concerns, public submissions to the council showed.
“These are mainly three-bedroom units, each with double beds, so the total number of eyes that will be looking into this area (my backyard) would be 110,” said a neighbor of the development, who has lived in Mosman since 1999 and asked to remain anonymous. “If they’re all occupied, it’s 110 eyes looking every time I hang my underwear outside.”
While that local backlash could yet create wider pressure for the government, politicians for now are siding with what they see as demographic inevitability.
“Sydney, Wollongong, Newcastle — these cities aren’t museums,” said Paul Scully, New South Wales planning minister. “They need to grow and evolve and adapt and change in the same way our population changes.”
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS