Australia’s affordable housing push has arrived in the wealthy Sydney suburb of Mosman, where new planning laws are challenging long-standing resistance to development in the leafy area known for mansions and sweeping harbor views.
State authorities in Sydney and Melbourne — Australia’s two biggest cities — are stripping some planning powers from suburban councils, including ones like Mosman that have created national headlines over opposition to new housing from older, wealthier constituents.
The broad policy shift comes as political deference to NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) sentiment gives way to demands for more housing from younger voters whose electoral heft now rivals the traditionally powerful baby boomer bloc.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In Mosman, there are fears the reforms will ultimately alter the character of the suburb, which boasts natural beauty, high-end stores and a median house price of more than A$5 million (US$3.23 million).
“We’re surrounded by water with harbor views, so there are people who are going to have literally millions of dollars knocked off the value of their property because their view will be blocked,” said Simon Menzies, an elected Mosman councillor of 20 years.
The new laws are designed to allow more housing at key transport and commercial hubs and give the New South Wales state government powers to override council objections to large developments.
Similar rules to fast-track three-story apartment blocks have been introduced in Melbourne’s state of Victoria.
Five kilometres from Mosman, a new metro line in the suburb of Crows Nest means the state government has given a 22-story apartment building the green light, overriding years-long council opposition.
In Mosman, objections from neighbors to one such proposal are already pouring in, but the council said there is little they can do about it.
The government intervention tracks a broader international trend, particularly in high-demand markets like London and California, where soaring costs have hampered home ownership for young people.
Sydney’s house prices have surged more than 30 percent over the past five years, outpacing wage growth.
New South Wales Premier Chris Minns warns that Sydney, the state’s capital, risks becoming “a city with no grandchildren.”
It is already the second-most unaffordable city globally after Hong Kong.
“Their narrative is get out of our way. We want to build as many homes as possible to enable young Sydney residents to buy their homes,” said Kos Samaras, director at polling firm Redbridge. “I think the political ballast that was there to protect the interests of homeowners is now gone.”
Australia’s sprawling cities are among the world’s least densely populated and historically built to accommodate suburban aspirations of owning detached houses with large backyards, not apartment living.
That has shifted in recent decades, particularly as waves of immigrants and students settle in high-rises around public transport hubs.
The latest housing push is designed to fill in the “missing middle” — townhouses, terraces and low-rise residential apartments, which typically meet opposition from councils.
Research from the Productivity Commission showed that industry is only building half as many homes at a time compared with 30 years ago, hampered in part by approval processes that can stretch more than a decade.
Australian Minister for Housing Clare O’Neil said that 40 years of state, local and federal government regulations have created an impenetrable “wall of bureaucracy” for anyone trying to build a house.
“I think we’ve reached a tipping point here where the majority of our population are actually in housing distress themselves or are deeply concerned about the people that they know, especially that younger generation,” O’Neil told Reuters.
After her party’s landslide victory in the May federal election, O’Neil is pledging “bigger and bolder” policies.
A productivity roundtable this month presents an opportunity to remove some of those requirements, she added.
The turnaround might have already started.
Building approvals of apartments surged almost 90 percent in the first half of the year, driven by a 33 percent jump in New South Wales. Construction jobs jumped 20 percent in the three months to May and construction starts of higher-density homes rose more than 20 percent in the first quarter.
Peter Tulip, chief economist at the Centre for Independent Studies, expects a substantial step-up in construction in New South Wales and Victoria from 2026 onward.
However, supply will still struggle to meet demand, pushing prices higher. Indeed, national home prices have hit fresh records each month, fueled by rate cuts and the expectations of more to come.
Justin Simon, chair of housing advocacy group Sydney YIMBY, said that Mosman had great amenity and was exactly the sort of place where new housing was needed.
“There is no way an ordinary person, essential workers, cleaners, nurses or anyone else could ever afford to live in Mosman, and that is because for decades they have stopped new homes being built and we need to turn that around,” he said.
Some Mosman property owners impacted by policy changes are joining forces to sell entire blocks to developers, capitalizing on strong demand for higher-density housing in the harborside suburb.
The first application under the new policy, for example, is a six-story residential building near the main town center, comprising 29 dwellings, most of which are the family-sized three-bedroom units Sydney lacks.
Objections cited issues such as traffic, road safety, parking and privacy concerns, public submissions to the council showed.
“These are mainly three-bedroom units, each with double beds, so the total number of eyes that will be looking into this area (my backyard) would be 110,” said a neighbor of the development, who has lived in Mosman since 1999 and asked to remain anonymous. “If they’re all occupied, it’s 110 eyes looking every time I hang my underwear outside.”
While that local backlash could yet create wider pressure for the government, politicians for now are siding with what they see as demographic inevitability.
“Sydney, Wollongong, Newcastle — these cities aren’t museums,” said Paul Scully, New South Wales planning minister. “They need to grow and evolve and adapt and change in the same way our population changes.”
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS