The parliamentary system originated in the UK, where a bicameral structure — comprising two houses — has long been in place. Many countries that have modeled their legislatures after the British system have likewise adopted a bicameral framework.
The widespread adoption of bicameralism is not without reason. In parliamentary politics, where decisions are made by majority rule, legislative debates can often be driven by emotion rather than reason, leading to hasty or irrational decisions. A bicameral system mitigates such risks by requiring concurrence from two separate chambers before a bill can become law, thereby preventing rash or careless legislation.
As the legislative branch of government, parliaments generally hold a superior position in terms of authority. Legislative power allows them to regulate all matters and interfere with the executive branch through budgetary powers.
As the representative body of the people, it is difficult to completely prevent a parliament from abusing its power.
Compared with autocratic rule by an individual, parliamentary despotism can be even more dangerous, as collective bodies are not easily held accountable. This flaw is especially pronounced under a unicameral system.
Originally, the term of office for members of the Legislative Yuan in Taiwan was three years, with the possibility of re-election. Elections were required to be held within three months before the end of each term, as stipulated in Article 65 of the Constitution. However, subsequent constitutional reforms have since increased the term to four years. Coupled with the unicameral system, this has significantly expanded the power of legislators, increasing the risk of abuse.
Some commentators argue that effective safeguards against legislative corruption should focus on shortening term lengths. This is because longer terms and greater power increase the “return on investment” for electoral campaigns, thereby incentivizing vote-buying and electoral bribery. Once elected, legislators might feel compelled to “repay political debts” through delivering promised legislative amendments that benefit the specific interests of their supporters.
Since legislators are primarily tasked with overseeing government operations, their terms should not be overly long. The US House of Representatives, for example, operates on a two-year term cycle. This encourages regular turnover, allowing voters to clearly assess their representatives’ performance. Competent legislators can be re-elected without the need for excessive campaign spending. This system reflects the foresight of the framers of the US constitution.
To curb the problems of vote-buying and legislative corruption stemming from “promised lawmaking” for personal gain, systemic reforms are essential, especially shortening the term of office for legislators.
Although the recall movement did not succeed, the civic leaders involved should not be discouraged. Their aspirations for reform are commendable, and they should persevere in their efforts for the nation and the public, and for the sake of freedom and democracy.
Tseng Chao-chang is a former chairman of the Taiwan Bar Association.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The political order of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) first took shape in 1988. Then-vice president Lee succeeded former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) after he passed, and served out the remainder of his term in office. In 1990, Lee was elected president by the National Assembly, and in 1996, he won Taiwan’s first direct presidential election. Those two, six and four-year terms were an era-defining 12-year presidential tenure. Throughout those years, Lee served as helmsman for Taiwan’s transition from martial law and authoritarianism to democracy. This period came to be known as the “quiet revolution,” leaving a legacy containing light
RSS