The parliamentary system originated in the UK, where a bicameral structure — comprising two houses — has long been in place. Many countries that have modeled their legislatures after the British system have likewise adopted a bicameral framework.
The widespread adoption of bicameralism is not without reason. In parliamentary politics, where decisions are made by majority rule, legislative debates can often be driven by emotion rather than reason, leading to hasty or irrational decisions. A bicameral system mitigates such risks by requiring concurrence from two separate chambers before a bill can become law, thereby preventing rash or careless legislation.
As the legislative branch of government, parliaments generally hold a superior position in terms of authority. Legislative power allows them to regulate all matters and interfere with the executive branch through budgetary powers.
As the representative body of the people, it is difficult to completely prevent a parliament from abusing its power.
Compared with autocratic rule by an individual, parliamentary despotism can be even more dangerous, as collective bodies are not easily held accountable. This flaw is especially pronounced under a unicameral system.
Originally, the term of office for members of the Legislative Yuan in Taiwan was three years, with the possibility of re-election. Elections were required to be held within three months before the end of each term, as stipulated in Article 65 of the Constitution. However, subsequent constitutional reforms have since increased the term to four years. Coupled with the unicameral system, this has significantly expanded the power of legislators, increasing the risk of abuse.
Some commentators argue that effective safeguards against legislative corruption should focus on shortening term lengths. This is because longer terms and greater power increase the “return on investment” for electoral campaigns, thereby incentivizing vote-buying and electoral bribery. Once elected, legislators might feel compelled to “repay political debts” through delivering promised legislative amendments that benefit the specific interests of their supporters.
Since legislators are primarily tasked with overseeing government operations, their terms should not be overly long. The US House of Representatives, for example, operates on a two-year term cycle. This encourages regular turnover, allowing voters to clearly assess their representatives’ performance. Competent legislators can be re-elected without the need for excessive campaign spending. This system reflects the foresight of the framers of the US constitution.
To curb the problems of vote-buying and legislative corruption stemming from “promised lawmaking” for personal gain, systemic reforms are essential, especially shortening the term of office for legislators.
Although the recall movement did not succeed, the civic leaders involved should not be discouraged. Their aspirations for reform are commendable, and they should persevere in their efforts for the nation and the public, and for the sake of freedom and democracy.
Tseng Chao-chang is a former chairman of the Taiwan Bar Association.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS