Several National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) students, accompanied by legislators and civil group representatives, recently accused an educator of coercing university soccer team members to collaborate with experiments for a research project, in which they were forced to donate blood three times a day for 14 consecutive days over years or risk flunking their courses if they did not comply. The university is accused of contravening the Human Subjects Research Act (人體研究法) and breaching research ethics.
This incident not only highlights major deficiencies in Taiwan’s regulation and enforcement of the act, but also suggests that this might be the tip of an iceberg.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare is tasked with overseeing the act, which means its head, Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源), cannot shirk his responsibility. I urge the health minister to review the following aspects of human subject research to find out if there are any other violations of ethics and human rights.
First, the government should swiftly and thoroughly review the Human Subjects Research Act and the Regulations for the Organization and Operation of Institutional Review Board (人體研究倫理審查委員會組織及運作管理辦法). Any terms that are outdated should be addressed.
There should also be more detailed regulations regarding who can become board members and the degree of proportional representation to ensure diversity and balance. A biannual review should be conducted to report misconducts if any.
Taiwan’s regulations regarding research and human rights have improved a lot since the passage of the act. Any laws and regulations concerning research development and human rights protection should be in line with the progress that has been made.
Second, the authorities should promptly conduct a comprehensive investigation into how many academic institutions and medical organizations are currently conducting human research and whether they comply with the law. Do the institutional review board members and administrative staff receive regular training?
The government should also establish a clear division of labor. Matters concerning medical ethics should be handled by the Department of Medical Affairs, while reports concerning drug trials and adverse effects should be handled by the Food and Drug Administration.
Third, there should be a mechanism to protect whistleblowers. The Public Interest Whistleblower Protection Act (公益揭弊者保護法) was passed in January and took effect on Tuesday. This is a huge milestone in the nation’s whistle-blower protection system.
However, the act only applies to government institutions, public organizations, state-run businesses and certain state-funded institutions, while much of the private sector is excluded. The effectiveness of the new act is yet to be seen.
The ministry should establish an independent reporting mechanism for human research to assure whistle-blowers that their identity would not be exposed. This is to avoid a recurrence of severe breaches of people’s rights in human research projects.
Chiu should make his stance clear, show his determination and set a deadline for these goals. This is crucial to upholding the nation’s commitment to promoting human rights and achieving the goal of “Healthy Taiwan.”
Huang Jin-shun is president of the Federation of Taiwan Pharmacists’ Associations.
Translated by Fion Khan
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
RSS