If Nvidia Corp chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) was hoping to reassure Washington that his company’s advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips would not be used to supercharge China’s military, his comments likely fell on deaf ears.
“We don’t have to worry about that,” he said of the US’ greatest fear about his firm’s access to the China market in an interview with CNN.
He argued that Beijing knows it cannot rely on the US technology, which “could be limited at any time.” It is optimistic thinking on his part, given the national security concerns that have fueled years of semiconductor restrictions.
This risk of China’s dependency on foreign tech was highlighted recently when the US imposed and then lifted export controls on chip design software within the span of a month. The abrupt policy U-turn suggests the restrictions were rolled out to be used as a bargaining chip in trade talks. However, it undoubtedly served as more evidence in Beijing’s mind that it is vulnerable to Washington’s ability to deploy such moves on a moment’s notice. This only spurs its desire to bolster self-reliance.
Huang’s remarks, notably, came on the eve of a planned trip to China this week, where he is slated to meet with senior officials and likely emphasize Nvidia’s commitment to the world’s largest market for semiconductors. The Santa Clara, California-based firm plans to launch a new AI chip that has been further modified to meet the ever-tightening controls, the Financial Times reported last week, just months after its previous made-for-China H20 chips were banned.
Nvidia needs to move quickly if it hopes to maintain its reign in China. Domestic giants from Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (阿里巴巴) to Tencent Holdings Ltd (騰訊) have reportedly been testing alternatives made by Huawei Technologies Co (華為), but most still prefer Nvidia’s offerings. This is because of the difficulty of adopting Huawei’s unique software system after years of creating AI tools on Nvidia’s architecture.
However, Huawei is planning a fundamental redesign of its next AI chip that would make it much easier for Chinese tech companies to switch, the Information reported last week. The rework is still in its early stages, but addresses a key hurdle that has prevented many firms from using local chips: It would allow code developers write for Nvidia’s systems to run on Huawei’s hardware. It is still a longshot, but if Huawei can pull this off, it would accelerate the local adoption of its tech stack. It also means Huang’s pitch to China would start to lose its allure.
Huawei has signaled global ambitions to unseat Nvidia’s dominance. While the Chinese player could still produce a limited amount of chips compared with the US rival, it is trying establish a foothold in the Middle East and Southeast Asia to expand its reach.
Huang has complained about the multibillion-dollar hit to his firm from the export controls, but Nvidia is doing just fine. It even hit a milestone last week, briefly becoming the first company in history to achieve a US$4 trillion market valuation. In the near term, the chipmaker is the clearest winner in a global AI race marked by who can amass the most amount of computing resources the quickest.
By this measure, US restrictions have been successful in slowing China’s AI ascendancy, but they have failed to stop it. Huang’s top concern seems to be whether his firm could stay in China and maintain its market concentration while further stalling the adoption of Huawei’s products — at home and abroad.
Ultimately, it does not matter whether Huang is correct on the possibility of dual-use military applications for his chips. Tough-on-China tech policies have become a bipartisan rallying cry in Washington, and a spate of cyberattacks linked to Beijing is not earning it any goodwill. However, there was another point in the wide-ranging CNN interview worth paying attention to.
Asked if it matters whether companies adopt US or Chinese models, Huang said: “In the end, I don’t think it does.”
He praised DeepSeek’s open-source R1 model, and added that it can be fine-tuned to address concerns about it being trained in China.
It suggests that he sees AI eventually becoming a commodity. This makes China’s cheaper offerings a lot more alluring in globally. It is also a sign that victory might not be about which model has beaten the latest benchmarks, but whose AI is most widely used by the rest of the world. That should be the biggest worry in Silicon Valley.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS