Between June and August 1914, in what history remembers as the Taroko War, 3,000 indigenous warriors of the Truku people fought for three relentless months against a force of 20,000 Japanese troops. The Japanese were well-armed with modern artillery, machine guns and a meticulously prepared strategy. Yet the Truku, vastly outgunned and cut off from supplies, resisted with extraordinary resolve in the mountains of eastern Taiwan until they were overwhelmed by exhaustion and a lack of resources.
That story, more than a century old, still resonates today — especially as Taiwan faces the looming threat of an all-out Chinese invasion. While the scale and nature of modern warfare are vastly different, the underlying truth remains: The survival of a people depends not just on firepower, but on the will to resist.
If China launches a full-scale attack, it would encounter not an isolated tribe, but a modern, democratic society with strong civil will, military preparedness and international awareness. Taiwan’s terrain, urban environments and growing civil defense capacity make it unlikely to fall quickly. Like the Truku in 1914, Taiwan might be able to hold out — for three weeks, three months or more.
Why does that time matter?
Because history shows that early resistance buys strategic opportunity. It allows for global attention, potential international assistance and the mobilization of long-term defense.
The lesson of the Taroko War is clear — even in the face of overwhelming odds, the spirit of resistance can shape history. Back then, it was 3,000 warriors in the mountains. Today, it is 23 million citizens defending democracy in a nation that has become a symbol of freedom in Asia.
If war does come, let us remember that if Taiwan can hold for three months, Taiwan can survive, and in doing so, it might secure not only its own future, but the stability of the free world.
Tu Hsin-fu is an indigenous affairs commentator.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS