The rebranding of “compassion seats” (博愛座) as “priority seating” (優先席) is a move toward clarity — a name rightly chosen, a concept aptly conveyed. With this change, supplemented by clear guidelines and sustained public awareness, the controversies once tied to these designated seats might gradually fade.
For many visitors to Taipei, the MRT leaves a lasting impression — not only for its cleanliness and order, but also for its compassion seats. Even during peak hours, these seats often remain vacant, reserved for those truly in need.
Yet in recent years, disputes over these seats have tarnished their original goodwill. Some who appear young and healthy — but might have needs that are not visible — find themselves shamed or even harassed for not yielding to elderly passengers. What begins as moral judgement escalates into verbal clashes, sometimes even physical altercations.
The term “compassion” is an inherent expression, appearing in classical texts more than two millennia ago. It calls for love beyond oneself — beyond family and friends — extending to strangers in a spirit of universal care.
Historically, “compassion” also translated the French revolutionary ideal of fraternity, or brotherhood, alongside liberty or freedom and equality. Here, it embodies the sentiment that “all under heaven are brothers.”
According to Taiwan’s Revised Mandarin Chinese Dictionary, a compassion seat is “a priority space for the elderly, infirm, pregnant, disabled or others in need, typically located near the doors of MRT trains, buses or other public transit vehicles.” This definition has evolved — years ago it was simply “seats near bus doors reserved for the elderly, women, children and the disabled.”
The concept originated in the West. During my doctoral studies in the US in the 1990s, buses and subways featured priority seating — functionally identical to Taiwan’s compassion seats, with the key word being priority. That is, those with needs come first; if none are present, others can sit.
Also called courtesy seating, these spots rely on consideration, not compulsion.
Compassion is an ideal. Courtesy reflects cultivation. Priority is practical. Returning to the essence of priority helps resolve disputes. Yet habits run deep — even renamed, many might still avoid these seats, wary of judgement. Changing this requires not just advocacy, but time.
Hugo Tseng holds a doctorate in linguistics, and is a lexicographer and former chair of the Soochow University English Department.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS