There is something unreal about the Ukraine recovery conference that got under way in Rome on Thursday morning. As Russia fired more than 730 long-range drones and missiles at targets across its neighbor on Tuesday last week, a record, and a further 400-plus overnight, it is a rescue conference that Kyiv needs right now.
Without security, there would not be a recovery to fund. This is the fourth such jamboree of well-intentioned international leaders and donors, but it takes place at a moment when the international support that enabled the country to fight off Russia’s invasion has faltered and prospects for peace have receded. Only German Chancellor Friedrich Merz acknowledged the elephant in the room: US President Donald Trump.
“Stay with us,” he exhorted the US president. With reduced US resources to bolster Ukraine’s defenses, how much will have to be rebuilt is changing by the day. How much will remain in Ukrainian hands for reconstruction is just as uncertain. Russian forces continue to make territorial gains, while Russian President Vladimir Putin has made clear his appetite runs even further than the four partly conquered provinces of Ukraine that he already declared part of Russia back in 2022.
You could hear the desperation on Wednesday night in the voices of Ukrainians assembled to press their case at a preconference dinner arranged by the Pinchuk Foundation, named after the billionaire Ukrainian businessman who funds it, but most of all in comments from Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine Keith Kellogg. A retired US Army lieutenant general, Kellogg choked with emotion as he did his best to deliver the administration’s message. We are closer than you think to World War III; the killing has to stop, he said. However, he went on, “You can’t quit.”
“We have an obligation in the West to make sure this has not been in vain,” he said.
“Do you want to be on the right side of history or not. Do you want to be on the moral side of history, or not?” he added.
What Kellogg said was clearly heartfelt, but to whom was he speaking? The Ukrainians are already doing all the fighting and are very clear about which side of history they are on.
The Europeans are trying, but their conduct of a foreign policy is like herding cats. They are also probably a decade behind in having the defense-production capabilities that would be needed to fill the void the US has created, as even previously authorized aid flows are turned on and off.
Or could it be that Kellogg was addressing Trump, as his absent boss wrestles with the realization that he has been played by Putin? There is a vital role for donor conferences, including post-war recovery plans, because Russia’s invasion of Ukraine would not end in any definitive way unless the country is overrun. Putin would otherwise continue trying to turn what remains of independent Ukraine into a failed state.
That makes it critical to show the commitment and resources are there to make those efforts fail. Even so, the leaders’ summit that is really needed right now would thrash out a joint allied strategy to persuade Putin he has nothing to gain by continuing the war. Ukraine first of all needs more air defense, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said in Rome on Thursday.
Trump just seemingly reversed his administration’s decision to halt a shipment of 30 patriot missiles, but he can and should start authorizing new interceptor deliveries of his own, rather than just interfering with those authorized by his predecessor.
Meanwhile, Europe just clapped itself on the back for committing to spend 5 perfect of GDP on defense by 2035. Most countries, with a few honorable Nordic exceptions, have spent well under 1 percent on helping Ukraine since Putin’s full invasion started in February 2022.
For Germany and Thursday’s host, Italy, that figure is 0.4 percent of GDP, according to data compiled by Germany’s Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
For the US, it is 0.56 percent of GDP. So the money is there. After air defenses, it is mostly money that is needed. The Ukrainian defense industry has the capacity this year to produce US$35 billion worth of arms, from drones and artillery shells, to mobile howitzers and ballistic missiles, but a budget for only US$12 billion, Oleksandr Kamyshin, Zelenskiy’s strategic affairs adviser, told me.
How to find the funds and additional air defense systems to weather Putin’s missile barrages should be the primary goal of every international meeting aimed at helping Ukraine until it’s achieved. “As long as it takes,” that favorite phrase of European leaders to demonstrate their commitment to Ukraine, must become “as fast as possible.”
Passing the enhanced Russia sanctions package that’s been waiting in the US Congress for Trump’s green light would be a great place to start, but there is no hiding that Europe would need to pick up more of the burden.
“I understand that democracies take time,” Khrystyna “Kudrava,” a Ukrainian national guard officer dealing with drones and electronic warfare, told the guests at the elegant Hassler Hotel atop the Spanish Steps on Wednesday night, “but Ukrainians can’t hold the line forever. It is your time now, Europeans.” She was right, except that it’s Trump’s time too.
Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether