From an entrepreneurial perspective, there is strong opposition to the recently passed amendments to the Court Organization Act (法院組織法) that would permit the live broadcasting of court procedures.
News reports said that if live broadcasts of trials are ultimately implemented, they would cost the country more than NT$500 billion (US$17.28 billion) each year. This amount is equivalent to 25 percent of Samsung Electronics Co’s annual revenue — an extremely alarming figure.
Last week, I flew back to Taiwan from India and had dinner with several restaurant owners. They said that if the government wastes NT$500 billion annually on live court broadcasts instead of thinking about how to improve Taiwan’s economy — regardless of whether the responsibility lies with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — they would refuse to accept that outcome.
These business owners all run small to medium-sized restaurant chains, and even just a few million New Taiwan dollars is significant to them — it is enough to help overcome the labor shortages and operational bottlenecks they face.
They said that the opposition parties are sowing chaos in the legislature, while the ruling party lacks initiative. To them, both are equally frustrating.
Three of the business owners who support the DPP said that, as the Legislative Yuan is currently controlled by the KMT-TPP alliance majority, the administration should work around it and interact directly with entrepreneurs.
President William Lai’s (賴清德) plan to set up a sovereign wealth fund is a great starting point, they said. They believe that Lai should focus his efforts on industrial transformation and use the executive branch’s authority to cooperate directly with businesses, thereby exerting pressure on unproductive legislators.
Companies such as Asustek Computer Inc and Acer Inc are the future Samsung, and firms such as Aerospace Industrial Development Corp should be integrated into the future Hanwha Group to manufacture missiles, tanks, submarines and more. If that were to happen, would opposition legislators still dare to arbitrarily cut the national defense budget? They would not, as it would be a market where businesses thrive. Industries should be scaled up, as that produces economic strength.
The food and beverage industry could also expand into the cultural sector — from girl groups and Taiwanese dramas to large-scale traditional media and popular culture, as well as the teaching of traditional languages and culture. Taiwanese, or Taiwanese Hokkien (Taiyu, 台語), and Hakka (客家語) are great examples.
China’s Xiamen University is actively collaborating with the Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Inc and the Philippines Fujian Association to teach Southern Min (Minnanyu, 閩南語) to Han Chinese Filipinos, since most people of Han Chinese heritage in the Philippines speak Southern Min. Taiwan should have taken the lead in launching a similar initiative, as it is a major opportunity for cultural export. Instead, Xiamen University got ahead, leveraging the Chinese Communist Party’s power of cultural influence.
If the food and beverage industry could help develop the nation’s key traditional and pop culture exports, would we still need to tolerate KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen’s (陳玉珍) mocking of cultural workers, saying that the media should “throw out the begging bowl”? Absolutely not. The government does not need to hog the spotlight — it just needs to support cultural enterprises by guaranteeing they can receive bank loans, thereby allowing them to reach their full potential.
The mass recall movement is in full swing, but business owners hold differing views. Business operators are struggling to deal with rising labor costs and the low employment rate. Meanwhile, the government — constrained by local labor rights protections — would not open up and allow for migrant workers. Could such behavior not lead constituents who originally supported your party to lose all motivation to do so?
Wang Wen-sheng is a doctoral student at Jindal University in India.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did