From an entrepreneurial perspective, there is strong opposition to the recently passed amendments to the Court Organization Act (法院組織法) that would permit the live broadcasting of court procedures.
News reports said that if live broadcasts of trials are ultimately implemented, they would cost the country more than NT$500 billion (US$17.28 billion) each year. This amount is equivalent to 25 percent of Samsung Electronics Co’s annual revenue — an extremely alarming figure.
Last week, I flew back to Taiwan from India and had dinner with several restaurant owners. They said that if the government wastes NT$500 billion annually on live court broadcasts instead of thinking about how to improve Taiwan’s economy — regardless of whether the responsibility lies with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — they would refuse to accept that outcome.
These business owners all run small to medium-sized restaurant chains, and even just a few million New Taiwan dollars is significant to them — it is enough to help overcome the labor shortages and operational bottlenecks they face.
They said that the opposition parties are sowing chaos in the legislature, while the ruling party lacks initiative. To them, both are equally frustrating.
Three of the business owners who support the DPP said that, as the Legislative Yuan is currently controlled by the KMT-TPP alliance majority, the administration should work around it and interact directly with entrepreneurs.
President William Lai’s (賴清德) plan to set up a sovereign wealth fund is a great starting point, they said. They believe that Lai should focus his efforts on industrial transformation and use the executive branch’s authority to cooperate directly with businesses, thereby exerting pressure on unproductive legislators.
Companies such as Asustek Computer Inc and Acer Inc are the future Samsung, and firms such as Aerospace Industrial Development Corp should be integrated into the future Hanwha Group to manufacture missiles, tanks, submarines and more. If that were to happen, would opposition legislators still dare to arbitrarily cut the national defense budget? They would not, as it would be a market where businesses thrive. Industries should be scaled up, as that produces economic strength.
The food and beverage industry could also expand into the cultural sector — from girl groups and Taiwanese dramas to large-scale traditional media and popular culture, as well as the teaching of traditional languages and culture. Taiwanese, or Taiwanese Hokkien (Taiyu, 台語), and Hakka (客家語) are great examples.
China’s Xiamen University is actively collaborating with the Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Inc and the Philippines Fujian Association to teach Southern Min (Minnanyu, 閩南語) to Han Chinese Filipinos, since most people of Han Chinese heritage in the Philippines speak Southern Min. Taiwan should have taken the lead in launching a similar initiative, as it is a major opportunity for cultural export. Instead, Xiamen University got ahead, leveraging the Chinese Communist Party’s power of cultural influence.
If the food and beverage industry could help develop the nation’s key traditional and pop culture exports, would we still need to tolerate KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen’s (陳玉珍) mocking of cultural workers, saying that the media should “throw out the begging bowl”? Absolutely not. The government does not need to hog the spotlight — it just needs to support cultural enterprises by guaranteeing they can receive bank loans, thereby allowing them to reach their full potential.
The mass recall movement is in full swing, but business owners hold differing views. Business operators are struggling to deal with rising labor costs and the low employment rate. Meanwhile, the government — constrained by local labor rights protections — would not open up and allow for migrant workers. Could such behavior not lead constituents who originally supported your party to lose all motivation to do so?
Wang Wen-sheng is a doctoral student at Jindal University in India.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS