From an entrepreneurial perspective, there is strong opposition to the recently passed amendments to the Court Organization Act (法院組織法) that would permit the live broadcasting of court procedures.
News reports said that if live broadcasts of trials are ultimately implemented, they would cost the country more than NT$500 billion (US$17.28 billion) each year. This amount is equivalent to 25 percent of Samsung Electronics Co’s annual revenue — an extremely alarming figure.
Last week, I flew back to Taiwan from India and had dinner with several restaurant owners. They said that if the government wastes NT$500 billion annually on live court broadcasts instead of thinking about how to improve Taiwan’s economy — regardless of whether the responsibility lies with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — they would refuse to accept that outcome.
These business owners all run small to medium-sized restaurant chains, and even just a few million New Taiwan dollars is significant to them — it is enough to help overcome the labor shortages and operational bottlenecks they face.
They said that the opposition parties are sowing chaos in the legislature, while the ruling party lacks initiative. To them, both are equally frustrating.
Three of the business owners who support the DPP said that, as the Legislative Yuan is currently controlled by the KMT-TPP alliance majority, the administration should work around it and interact directly with entrepreneurs.
President William Lai’s (賴清德) plan to set up a sovereign wealth fund is a great starting point, they said. They believe that Lai should focus his efforts on industrial transformation and use the executive branch’s authority to cooperate directly with businesses, thereby exerting pressure on unproductive legislators.
Companies such as Asustek Computer Inc and Acer Inc are the future Samsung, and firms such as Aerospace Industrial Development Corp should be integrated into the future Hanwha Group to manufacture missiles, tanks, submarines and more. If that were to happen, would opposition legislators still dare to arbitrarily cut the national defense budget? They would not, as it would be a market where businesses thrive. Industries should be scaled up, as that produces economic strength.
The food and beverage industry could also expand into the cultural sector — from girl groups and Taiwanese dramas to large-scale traditional media and popular culture, as well as the teaching of traditional languages and culture. Taiwanese, or Taiwanese Hokkien (Taiyu, 台語), and Hakka (客家語) are great examples.
China’s Xiamen University is actively collaborating with the Federation of Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Inc and the Philippines Fujian Association to teach Southern Min (Minnanyu, 閩南語) to Han Chinese Filipinos, since most people of Han Chinese heritage in the Philippines speak Southern Min. Taiwan should have taken the lead in launching a similar initiative, as it is a major opportunity for cultural export. Instead, Xiamen University got ahead, leveraging the Chinese Communist Party’s power of cultural influence.
If the food and beverage industry could help develop the nation’s key traditional and pop culture exports, would we still need to tolerate KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen’s (陳玉珍) mocking of cultural workers, saying that the media should “throw out the begging bowl”? Absolutely not. The government does not need to hog the spotlight — it just needs to support cultural enterprises by guaranteeing they can receive bank loans, thereby allowing them to reach their full potential.
The mass recall movement is in full swing, but business owners hold differing views. Business operators are struggling to deal with rising labor costs and the low employment rate. Meanwhile, the government — constrained by local labor rights protections — would not open up and allow for migrant workers. Could such behavior not lead constituents who originally supported your party to lose all motivation to do so?
Wang Wen-sheng is a doctoral student at Jindal University in India.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS