Recalls are not easy
As the historic recall wave targeting 26 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators continues, many civic groups and volunteers feel energized. A surge of public anger has driven the widespread momentum of the recall campaigns.
However, amid the passion, there might exist a dangerously overlooked fact: Successful recalls are much harder to achieve than they appear.
For a recall to succeed, two conditions must be met: The number of “yes” votes must exceed 25 percent of all eligible voters in the constituency and the “yes” votes must outnumber the “no” votes.
This is deceptively steep. Let us break down what this means using numbers.
Imagine a constituency with 100,000 eligible voters. In the last Legislative Yuan election, the turnout was 71.78 percent — about the national average. Suppose the KMT candidate won with 45 percent of the vote and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate got 40 percent. That would mean roughly 28,700 people voted for the DPP candidate. To recall the sitting KMT legislator, at least 25,000 “yes” votes would be needed. Nearly 87 percent of the people who voted for the DPP candidate in the original election must come out to vote “yes.”
Even if the 25,000 “yes” votes are achieved, they are meaningless if the “no” votes outnumber them. That becomes even more sobering in “blue-leaning” constituencies, where the original DPP candidate’s support base might have been less than 30 percent. In those districts, achieving 25 percent “yes” votes might require the turnout of all DPP supporters and some swing voters. That level of mobilization is difficult even in general elections, let alone a recall vote.
None of this is to say recalls are impossible. However, success demands a brutally honest understanding of the odds and a highly coordinated effort to beat them.
Every vote matters. Every absence hurts. Volunteers must mobilize people to vote, remind them again and drive home the urgency. To win, they must aim for 100 percent of their own base turning out to vote “yes.” Otherwise, the movement risks learning the hard way that arithmetic — not emotion — decides the outcome.
John Cheng
Taichung
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
RSS