As the 14th Dalai Lama approaches his 90th birthday, he has made a proclamation that reverberates far beyond the monastic halls of Dharamsala: His reincarnation would not be born in Tibet so long as it remains under Chinese rule. This is not merely a spiritual declaration — it is a geopolitical masterstroke that strikes at the heart of Beijing’s long-standing strategy to control Tibetan Buddhism from within.
The Dalai Lama’s announcement is a reaffirmation of Tibetan religious sovereignty and a pre-emptive strike against Chinese political theater. By declaring that his reincarnation would occur in exile and that only the Gaden Phodrang Trust — his official office — has the authority to recognize his successor, he has effectively delegitimized any attempt by Beijing to manufacture a puppet Dalai Lama within its borders.
This move is not without precedent. In 1995, the Dalai Lama recognized a young boy, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, as the 11th Panchen Lama — only for the child to be abducted by Chinese authorities and replaced with a state-approved figure. That incident became a chilling reminder of how Beijing seeks to co-opt Tibetan spiritual institutions to consolidate its rule. The Dalai Lama’s current stance ensures that history would not repeat itself so easily.
China has long insisted that it alone has the authority to approve reincarnations of Tibetan lamas, citing an 18th century Qing Dynasty ritual involving a golden urn. However, this claim is as much about political control as it is about religious tradition. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) goal is clear: To install a compliant Dalai Lama who would rubber-stamp Beijing’s policies in Tibet and neuter the global influence of the Tibetan cause.
By contrast, the Dalai Lama’s declaration recenters the process within the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and places it firmly outside the reach of the Chinese state. It also internationalizes the issue, drawing support from Buddhist communities across Mongolia, the Himalayas and even within China itself.
We are now heading toward a future with two Dalai Lamas: one chosen by Tibetan Buddhist leaders in exile and another anointed by the CCP. However, legitimacy cannot be manufactured. The Dalai Lama’s spiritual authority is not derived from political power, but from centuries of tradition, devotion and moral leadership. A Beijing-backed Dalai Lama might wear the robes, but he would not wear the trust of the Tibetan people.
This schism would not only deepen the divide between Tibetans and the Chinese state — it would also test the resolve of the international community. Will democratic nations recognize the reincarnation chosen by Tibetan Buddhists, or will they bow to Beijing’s narrative?
In essence, the Dalai Lama has built a spiritual firewall against authoritarian interference. His proclamation ensures that the soul of Tibetan Buddhism cannot be co-opted by a regime that seeks to erase its identity. It is a bold act of resistance cloaked in the language of faith — a reminder that even in exile, the Dalai Lama remains the unyielding heartbeat of people who refuse to forget who they are.
In doing so, he has not only safeguarded the future of his lineage, but also reignited the global conversation about Tibet’s right to self-determination — one reincarnation at a time.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
RSS