As the 14th Dalai Lama approaches his 90th birthday, he has made a proclamation that reverberates far beyond the monastic halls of Dharamsala: His reincarnation would not be born in Tibet so long as it remains under Chinese rule. This is not merely a spiritual declaration — it is a geopolitical masterstroke that strikes at the heart of Beijing’s long-standing strategy to control Tibetan Buddhism from within.
The Dalai Lama’s announcement is a reaffirmation of Tibetan religious sovereignty and a pre-emptive strike against Chinese political theater. By declaring that his reincarnation would occur in exile and that only the Gaden Phodrang Trust — his official office — has the authority to recognize his successor, he has effectively delegitimized any attempt by Beijing to manufacture a puppet Dalai Lama within its borders.
This move is not without precedent. In 1995, the Dalai Lama recognized a young boy, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, as the 11th Panchen Lama — only for the child to be abducted by Chinese authorities and replaced with a state-approved figure. That incident became a chilling reminder of how Beijing seeks to co-opt Tibetan spiritual institutions to consolidate its rule. The Dalai Lama’s current stance ensures that history would not repeat itself so easily.
China has long insisted that it alone has the authority to approve reincarnations of Tibetan lamas, citing an 18th century Qing Dynasty ritual involving a golden urn. However, this claim is as much about political control as it is about religious tradition. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) goal is clear: To install a compliant Dalai Lama who would rubber-stamp Beijing’s policies in Tibet and neuter the global influence of the Tibetan cause.
By contrast, the Dalai Lama’s declaration recenters the process within the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and places it firmly outside the reach of the Chinese state. It also internationalizes the issue, drawing support from Buddhist communities across Mongolia, the Himalayas and even within China itself.
We are now heading toward a future with two Dalai Lamas: one chosen by Tibetan Buddhist leaders in exile and another anointed by the CCP. However, legitimacy cannot be manufactured. The Dalai Lama’s spiritual authority is not derived from political power, but from centuries of tradition, devotion and moral leadership. A Beijing-backed Dalai Lama might wear the robes, but he would not wear the trust of the Tibetan people.
This schism would not only deepen the divide between Tibetans and the Chinese state — it would also test the resolve of the international community. Will democratic nations recognize the reincarnation chosen by Tibetan Buddhists, or will they bow to Beijing’s narrative?
In essence, the Dalai Lama has built a spiritual firewall against authoritarian interference. His proclamation ensures that the soul of Tibetan Buddhism cannot be co-opted by a regime that seeks to erase its identity. It is a bold act of resistance cloaked in the language of faith — a reminder that even in exile, the Dalai Lama remains the unyielding heartbeat of people who refuse to forget who they are.
In doing so, he has not only safeguarded the future of his lineage, but also reignited the global conversation about Tibet’s right to self-determination — one reincarnation at a time.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
RSS