Chinese intimidation of Taiwan has entered a chilling new phase: bolder, more multifaceted and unconstrained by diplomatic norms. For years, Taiwan has weathered economic coercion, military threats, diplomatic isolation, political interference, espionage and disinformation, but the direct targeting of elected leaders abroad signals an alarming escalation in Beijing’s campaign of hostility.
Czech military intelligence recently uncovered a plot that reads like fiction, but is all too real. Chinese diplomats and civil secret service in Prague had planned to ram the motorcade of then-vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and physically assault her during her visit to the Czech Republic in March last year.
Taiwanese officials have rightly labeled this as “transnational repression.” We should call it what it is: endangering the life of a democratically elected leader. Although Czech authorities thwarted the plot, the warning is clear: Beijing is willing to cross any line to threaten and silence Taiwanese leadership. This cannot be allowed to become the new normal. In a world that claims to be governed by a rules-based international order, this was nothing short of a planned political attack, one that must not be dismissed or normalized under the cover of the “one China” policy.
China’s cross-border harassment is not new. Its officials have long targeted Taiwanese diplomats and students abroad, as well as Hong Kong dissidents, sometimes violently. In 2020, Chinese diplomats disrupted Taiwan’s Double Ten National Day event in Fiji and physically assaulted Taiwanese staff. The Prague incident marks a new threshold: What was once intimidation is now premeditated violence. This is not diplomacy; it is state-sponsored coercion.
This is happening now because Beijing’s traditional tactics are faltering. Taiwan has grown more resilient, deepening its partnerships across Europe and Asia, and garnering broader international support. As diplomatic poaching yields diminishing returns, China is resorting to more extreme measures to intimidate Taiwanese leaders and deter others from engaging with Taipei. The strategy is plain: To keep Taiwan off the international stage and isolate it by any means necessary.
The international outrage to the Prague plot has been swift, but coverage alone is not enough. China’s actions are not merely Taiwan’s problem; they are a direct challenge to democratic norms and the global rules-based order. What happens to Taiwan today could happen to other liberal democracies tomorrow. A collective response is essential.
What can be done?
First, liberal democracies must speak with one voice. This was a violent threat against a democratically elected leader. The world must condemn it clearly and forcefully.
Second, there must be accountability. Chinese officials involved in such plots should face consequences, including the possibility of diplomatic expulsions. When red lines are crossed, there must be repercussions and a clear message that China is not immune to such illegal activities, not on foreign soil at least.
Third, democratic countries must strengthen security coordination concerning Taiwan. Although Taipei lacks formal diplomatic recognition, it maintains extensive unofficial relations worldwide. It is a key economic and technological partner to many, as well as a hub for advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Its leaders and officials deserve the same protection given to any visiting dignitary. Ensuring their safety is a duty and responsibility.
Fourth, there must be legal deterrents. In the US, the TAIPEI Act and the Taiwan Peace and Stability Act offer valuable models. Similar frameworks should be adopted in other countries to protect partners facing coercion and interference.
Fifth, countries must not back down from legitimate engagement with Taiwan. Beijing has no authority to dictate who may communicate with whom. The Czech Republic has demonstrated admirable resolve, from Czech Senate President Milos Vystrcil’s visit to Taipei in 2020 to its warm welcome of Hsiao last year. These actions are more than mere gestures; they stand as powerful affirmations that democratic values cannot be silenced through intimidation and bullying.
If the world is serious about upholding a rules-based order, now is the time to draw firm boundaries and stand together in its defense.
“Taiwan will not be isolated by intimidation,” Hsiao said.
Indeed, Taiwan will neither be intimidated nor silenced. However, the international community must do its part: Support Taiwan’s right to exist, engage and remain secure. A stable Indo-Pacific region and a functioning international order are impossible if Taiwan is left vulnerable to violence, coercion and repression.
Chen Kuan-ting is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator and a member of the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee. Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS