Chinese intimidation of Taiwan has entered a chilling new phase: bolder, more multifaceted and unconstrained by diplomatic norms. For years, Taiwan has weathered economic coercion, military threats, diplomatic isolation, political interference, espionage and disinformation, but the direct targeting of elected leaders abroad signals an alarming escalation in Beijing’s campaign of hostility.
Czech military intelligence recently uncovered a plot that reads like fiction, but is all too real. Chinese diplomats and civil secret service in Prague had planned to ram the motorcade of then-vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and physically assault her during her visit to the Czech Republic in March last year.
Taiwanese officials have rightly labeled this as “transnational repression.” We should call it what it is: endangering the life of a democratically elected leader. Although Czech authorities thwarted the plot, the warning is clear: Beijing is willing to cross any line to threaten and silence Taiwanese leadership. This cannot be allowed to become the new normal. In a world that claims to be governed by a rules-based international order, this was nothing short of a planned political attack, one that must not be dismissed or normalized under the cover of the “one China” policy.
China’s cross-border harassment is not new. Its officials have long targeted Taiwanese diplomats and students abroad, as well as Hong Kong dissidents, sometimes violently. In 2020, Chinese diplomats disrupted Taiwan’s Double Ten National Day event in Fiji and physically assaulted Taiwanese staff. The Prague incident marks a new threshold: What was once intimidation is now premeditated violence. This is not diplomacy; it is state-sponsored coercion.
This is happening now because Beijing’s traditional tactics are faltering. Taiwan has grown more resilient, deepening its partnerships across Europe and Asia, and garnering broader international support. As diplomatic poaching yields diminishing returns, China is resorting to more extreme measures to intimidate Taiwanese leaders and deter others from engaging with Taipei. The strategy is plain: To keep Taiwan off the international stage and isolate it by any means necessary.
The international outrage to the Prague plot has been swift, but coverage alone is not enough. China’s actions are not merely Taiwan’s problem; they are a direct challenge to democratic norms and the global rules-based order. What happens to Taiwan today could happen to other liberal democracies tomorrow. A collective response is essential.
What can be done?
First, liberal democracies must speak with one voice. This was a violent threat against a democratically elected leader. The world must condemn it clearly and forcefully.
Second, there must be accountability. Chinese officials involved in such plots should face consequences, including the possibility of diplomatic expulsions. When red lines are crossed, there must be repercussions and a clear message that China is not immune to such illegal activities, not on foreign soil at least.
Third, democratic countries must strengthen security coordination concerning Taiwan. Although Taipei lacks formal diplomatic recognition, it maintains extensive unofficial relations worldwide. It is a key economic and technological partner to many, as well as a hub for advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Its leaders and officials deserve the same protection given to any visiting dignitary. Ensuring their safety is a duty and responsibility.
Fourth, there must be legal deterrents. In the US, the TAIPEI Act and the Taiwan Peace and Stability Act offer valuable models. Similar frameworks should be adopted in other countries to protect partners facing coercion and interference.
Fifth, countries must not back down from legitimate engagement with Taiwan. Beijing has no authority to dictate who may communicate with whom. The Czech Republic has demonstrated admirable resolve, from Czech Senate President Milos Vystrcil’s visit to Taipei in 2020 to its warm welcome of Hsiao last year. These actions are more than mere gestures; they stand as powerful affirmations that democratic values cannot be silenced through intimidation and bullying.
If the world is serious about upholding a rules-based order, now is the time to draw firm boundaries and stand together in its defense.
“Taiwan will not be isolated by intimidation,” Hsiao said.
Indeed, Taiwan will neither be intimidated nor silenced. However, the international community must do its part: Support Taiwan’s right to exist, engage and remain secure. A stable Indo-Pacific region and a functioning international order are impossible if Taiwan is left vulnerable to violence, coercion and repression.
Chen Kuan-ting is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator and a member of the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee. Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS