The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has always stood firmly behind the welfare of our military personnel. Since taking office in 2016, the DPP administration has invested more than NT$25 billion (US$842.7 million) in improving military benefits through the national budget. It has also raised salaries for public servants, including military personnel, four times, with a cumulative increase of 14 percent.
In March, President William Lai (賴清德) announced a NT$12,000 raise for volunteer soldiers. Last week, the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications jointly introduced a priority boarding program for active-duty troops, reflecting a broader effort by the government to enhance respect, dignity and convenience for military personnel in everyday life. These are concrete measures backed by policy planning and financial responsibility, not rushed proposals meant to create headlines.
What the DPP cannot support, however, is the opposition’s reckless push to override constitutional limits in the name of so-called support. On Tuesday, the legislature passed amendments to the Pay Act of the Armed Forces (軍人待遇條例), adding a new NT$30,000 monthly allowance for volunteer soldiers, effective from January next year. At first glance, this might seem like a generous show of support for the military.
The political strategy is clear: The opposition is setting a trap. If the Executive Yuan refuses to implement these amendments on constitutional grounds, they would seize the opportunity to paint the government as unsupportive of the military. The same tactic was used earlier this year when the government sought a constitutional review of the Police Personnel Management Act (警察人員人事條例) and the DPP was promptly accused of being anti-police and anti-firefighter. Their strategy is not about helping soldiers and service personnel, but about using them as a shield for populist theatrics.
In reality, it is the third major spending bill passed in just a few months without proper budgeting or consultation with the Executive Yuan. This is less about national defense and more about political posturing. In October last year, opposition legislators amended the Logging Ban Compensation for Lands Reserved for Indigenous Peoples Act (原住民保留地禁伐補償條例), increasing subsidies by NT$2.6 billion. In January, they passed a new police retirement package, raising the monthly pension ceiling to more than NT$74,000 and pushing government expenditures higher by at least NT$60 billion. Now, another proposal is on the table: a NT$10,000 universal cash handout to all citizens, which would raise overall public spending by at least NT$233.5 billion.
These actions contravene Article 70 of the Constitution, which bars the legislature from increasing spending in budget bills submitted by the Executive Yuan. They also go against Article 91 of the Budget Act (預算法) and Article 5 of the Fiscal Discipline Act (財政紀律法), which require legislators to consult with the Executive Yuan and identify funding sources before proposing laws that involve large public spending.
Saying no to unconstitutional legislation is not a sign of neglect. It is a commitment to doing things the right way. Military and other social welfare should be built on a sustainable foundation, not inflated promises passed on impulse. The NT$30,000 salary increase package was proposed without prudent deliberation or any fiscal evidence-based justification. If everything becomes a political bidding war, there would be no room left for serious reform or long-term planning.
Soldiers deserve respect, not manipulation. The people deserve honesty, not theatrics. Taiwan deserves a legislature that puts principle ahead of politics.
Gahon Chiang is a staff member of DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting, focusing on national security policy.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS