While the Executive Yuan and local governments are still trading fire over cuts to local subsidies, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers, who command a slim majority in the legislature, on Tuesday passed a bill raising military allowances, fueling a new wave of contention over budget allocations.
The opposition-controlled Legislative Yuan in January slashed the central government’s proposed budget by NT$207.5 billion (US$6.996 billion), or a record 6.6 percent of the total. That was far larger than the 1.1 percent to 1.3 percent annual cuts over the past decade. On top of the NT$143.9 billion cuts for specific expenditure items in the central government’s budget, the Executive Yuan was left with NT$63.6 billion and had to choose which budget items to remove.
To avoid more cuts that would seriously impact spending for national defense, diplomacy and education or reduce interest payments for debts that would result in breaches of contracts and loss of international trust, the Cabinet on May 22 announced that it would cut subsidies to local governments by 25 percent. Several KMT-ruled local governments responded by filing administrative appeals, but the Cabinet said it had no choice and that it was the only way it could follow the opposition’s mandate to cut its budget.
According to Article 69 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) and Article 30 of the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), the central government must provide subsidies to local governments and has the legal authority to decide the amount of subsidies.
Although general subsidies would be reduced, most cities and counties would still see an increase in their over-all subsidies from last year, including the four KMT-governed special municipalities: Funding would increase by NT$8.2 billion for Taipei, NT$6.8 billion for New Taipei City, NT$4.6 billion for Taichung and NT$5.3 billion for Taoyuan.
The subsidy reductions should come as no surprise after opposition lawmakers slashed the central government’s budget and their arbitrary action would most likely backfire. However, to add salt to wound, opposition legislators have proposed a slew of bills that could worsen the nation’s financial situation and cause more political unrest. The KMT has proposed a cash handout of NT$10,000 to each taxpayer, which is estimated to cost NT$230 billion. On Tuesday, it passed a bill increasing volunteer soldiers’ allowances to NT$30,000, which would cost about NT$30 billion. That is ironic, given that the opposition had cut the defense budget by NT$8.4 billion, which could hinder President William Lai’s (賴清德) policy starting in April to raise the monthly salaries of military soldiers.
The budget proposals are obviously moves to win over the public amid a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. However, they would not only crowd out budgets for public welfare, but also trigger more political controversy amid disputes over the constitutionality of the proposals. The Budget Act (預算法) and the Fiscal Discipline Act (財政紀律法) state that legislators are not to propose increases to the expenditures in the Executive Yuan’s budget bill and should not infringe on the power of the administration to allocate budgets.
The opposition lawmakers’ controversial legislations have sparked a nationwide recall campaign. More reckless manipulations of the national budget would only add fuel to the public discontent, and spur many more to seek a change to the state of the legislature.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS