A full, independent investigation into the killings of Palestinians attempting to collect food for their family, and accountability for their deaths, is essential, but no investigation is needed to establish that Israel is ultimately responsible, by starving people and then implementing a food-collection scheme that cannot solve the humanitarian crisis, and which is known to be dangerous. The US, which promoted that scheme, is complicit.
Health officials in Gaza said that at least 27 people were killed by Israeli fire as they awaited food on Tuesday last week — the third such incident in three days.
The Israeli military said troops fired at people “moving towards [them] ... in a way that posed a threat.”
Officials previously said that Israeli forces killed more than 30 Palestinians on June 1, and another three the following day; the Israeli military said it did not shoot civilians, but fired “warning shots.”
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) — the US private organization running the scheme — suspended operations on Wednesday for “update, organization and efficiency improvement work.”
No update can fix this: The food scheme itself is the problem. The UN and aid agencies feared that it breached international law and refused to work with the GHF; the founding director resigned, saying that GHF would not be able to deliver aid while adhering to humanitarian principles. Senior Israeli military officials reportedly raised concerns. Many people cannot reach the sites. Those who do face a greater risk of having meagre supplies snatched by other desperate people. Essential non-food goods such as medications are not included. The risk of shootings was clear: armed US contractors run the three sites and Israeli troops control the surrounding areas. Palestinians are forced to choose — risk their lives or watch their children starve.
After 11 weeks of total siege, followed by a trickle of supplies, Gaza is the hungriest place on Earth, the UN said.
It was never plausible that this scheme could feed it. It is a fig leaf for Israel’s continued starvation of civilians, and helps displace them to an ever smaller area. The far-right Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich has said that Gaza would be “entirely destroyed” so that its population would “leave in great numbers to third countries.” In short, ethnic cleansing.
The use of food as a weapon comes in addition to strikes on schools being used as shelters, the destruction of hospitals and the killing of tens of thousands of civilians. Israel’s war crimes have caused public support to plummet in western Europe and fall markedly in the US. Yet politicians are lagging. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer calls the situation “intolerable,” but until the UK acts decisively it is, in reality, tolerating it. The UK, France and Canada warned of “concrete measures” and must follow through. The US could stop this conflict tomorrow, but the EU, Israel’s biggest trading partner, also has real power. It is now reviewing its trade agreement with Israel; it should suspend it. Improving aid is a necessary, but not sufficient demand. The need is created by the war. The real solution is still a ceasefire and release of the hostages seized by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023.
As International Committee of the Red Cross president Mirjana Spoljaric has warned, international law itself is being hollowed out — with profound implications for conflicts to come. As long as Israel enjoys impunity, more Palestinians die and human lives everywhere are cheapened. It must be held accountable.
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS