The selection of Robert Francis Prevost as the successor to Pope Francis is part of an internal Catholic Church desire to continue the latter’s reform agenda. In terms of international relations, the key question is whether Pope Leo XIV would choose to maintain the path of engagement with China that his predecessor had begun.
The discussion centers on a controversial 2018 agreement between China and the Vatican, designed to share the authority for appointing bishops in the Chinese state-controlled Catholic Church. Critically, China has breached this agreement, appointing bishops without prior Holy See approval, thereby exposing its real agenda.
Despite these developments in the implementation of the agreement, which was renewed last year, the Holy See remains convinced that it can best serve the interests of the Catholic community in China through an understanding that faces an uncertain path to full realization.
Whether this might lead to the recognition of China as a state, potentially replacing or coexisting with the recognition currently afforded to Taiwan, is a separate issue for which no clear basis exists.
The concept of an inherent equation between “pacification” and “normalization” must be rejected, given the Holy See’s conviction of the opportuneness of not revolutionizing the existing balances that underpin its foreign policy agenda in Asia and beyond.
Therefore, when speaking of “continuity” in governance, it can indeed be assumed that Leo would continue to consider himself bound by the agreement signed with China last year, despite being aware of Beijing’s unwillingness to adhere to the bilateral terms agreed upon in 2018, while at the same time being reluctant to make any sort of formal recognition.
However, a distinct layer of analysis can be introduced, given Leo’s personal view of relations with China and Taiwan. In this regard, a compelling insight is provided by the remarks of outgoing ambassador to the Vatican Matthew Lee (李世明) about a meeting with then-cardinal Prevost in 2023.
The then-cardinal had emphasized his full awareness of the differences between “democratic Taiwan” and “communist China,” Lee told the Central News Agency. This serves as component in the emerging portrait of Prevost, a figure keenly aware of the need to align with democracies during an era increasingly conducive to the proliferation of authoritarian regimes.
Further proof of this comes from statements made by Leo to Peru’s Seminario Expresion in 2022 regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine. He had spoken of an imperialistic design implemented by Russian President Vladimir Putin to increase his sphere of influence in Europe.
Even if Prevost’s statements have softened since his election as pontiff, looking back at his previous remarks can serve as a valuable indicator for imagining the foreign policy trajectories his pontificate might take.
Specifically, Leo’s steadfast commitment to human rights and democratic values, of which he has always been an advocate, suggests a firm basis for a decisive stance should tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait.
Given these considerations, assuming that former vice president Chen Chien-jen’s (陳建仁) attendance at the inauguration of Leo’s pontificate, in place of President William Lai (賴清德), indicates a “pattern of the Holy See’s careful calibration to avoid offending Beijing” is a pessimistic outlook unsupported by concrete evidence.
Leo’s actual foreign policy agenda, coupled with the broader signals he sends, would be the true indicators of the Church’s general direction. Premature judgements risk a partial representation of reality, hindering the ability to analyze events in the most accurate and objective way.
Therefore, it is crucial to analyze events with the instruments at observers’ disposal, steering clear of biased interpretations that cannot capture the true subtleties of reality.
The foundations are certainly different from those experienced since the very beginning of former pope Francis’ election, who declined the invitation to visit Taiwan and repeatedly expressed hopes of visiting China.
Given these distinct initial conditions, the prospect of genuinely strengthened relations between Taiwan and the Holy See is a tangible one. By undertaking a conducive action to deepen ties with Taipei, Leo would demonstrate his firm commitment to democratic and liberal values. Therefore, we must refute the pessimistic forecasts that are circulating before the new pope’s concrete actions could be assessed.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at Il Caffe Geopolitico, an online international law journal, and the think tank Geopol21.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS