The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on Tuesday said it had taken measures to prevent espionage by party members, after a former staffer was allegedly discovered using a cellphone with a Chinese spying app.
Former DPP staffer Huang Chu-jung (黃取榮) and four other former party members allegedly gathered information on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) while working for the government.
DPP spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) said the party is requiring notification from its officials before they leave the country and to report upon return, increasing officials’ understanding of national security and conducting background checks of all new party members.
Investigating the background of prospective party members should be a given. This is true for anyone who would gain access to confidential information, but should also be true for junior party members. The CCP usually uses low-level officials or military personnel to establish a network of people who are privy to sensitive information.
The efficacy of informing recruits about the illegality and risks to national security of working with the CCP would depend on their motivations. Entry-level officials and staffers would not be well-paid, and they might be ideologically conditioned, making them prime targets for the CCP. The best approach would be to ensure that there are clear paths for career development for military and public service recruits, and to convey those opportunities when they are recruited. It should also inform recruits that acts of sedition could result in jail time and a lifetime exclusion from public service employment.
Placing conditions on the international travel of DPP members might deter contact with CCP members abroad, but the DPP has limited capabilities to investigate who staffers interact with when they are outside Taiwan, particularly in China.
It could ban staffers from traveling to China outright, but that is also unlikely to be effective. Much like how Americans visit Cuba by flying there from Mexico or Canada, despite a US tourism ban on Cuba, Taiwanese could fly to China from Japan or a neighboring country. It could still require disclosure of foreign travel and contacts with Chinese nationals, but this would be more of a formality than an effective measure for preventing collusion. Also, it would be of limited benefit to prevent DPP members from visiting China if those of opposition parties could still do so.
What the government could do instead is to use artificial intelligence (AI) to track changes in people in the military’s or public service’s patterns of travel, economic activity and daily routines, as well as changes in their access to information or contacts. Such activity could be flagged for a follow-up by senior staff or, in the case of egregious changes in behavior, national security officials.
Commenting on a ban on exchanges between Taiwanese universities and three Chinese universities, the Mainland Affairs Council on Tuesday said that the schools were among “multiple channels” that the CCP uses to “attract and absorb Taiwanese.”
The ban, which went into effect on Feb. 20, applies to Huaqiao University, Beijing Chinese Language and Culture College and Guangzhou-based Jinan University, where Huang studied.
The ban is really a moot point, because all businesses and universities in China are under the administration and influence of the CCP to some degree, even if the CCP does not always exert its control directly.
Authorities generally aim to control the extent of cross-strait exchanges, like opening a water tap only slightly to avoid a flood. The problem is that the CCP has its hand in every single exchange that takes place with Taiwan. The more exchanges that take place, the harder it is to keep the deluge at bay. The government should use AI to the best extent possible, and scrutinize all cross-strait exchanges.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS