South Korean K-pop group Blackpink on Tuesday announced their return to the National Stadium in Kaohsiung, where they are to hold two concerts on Oct. 18 and 19. With only two weeks remaining until tickets go on sale, accommodation in Kaohsiung is being flooded with an overwhelming number of reservations, and nearly all hotels are already fully booked.
At the Hotel Nikko Kaohsiung — a Japanese-style five-star hotel that opened in November last year — only scenic suites on the upper floors remain available, and prices for those dates have soared to nearly NT$40,000 per night. This is worlds away from the usual weekday rate of about NT$7,000 per night, despite the fact that the hotel is more than 40 minutes away from the concert venue by MRT. This illustrates the powerful spillover effect of the concert economy.
The Kaohsiung City Government last week invited representatives from the four major international entertainment agencies to scout the city for the first time, and rumors have since spread that US pop diva Lady Gaga and others might hold concerts in the city. Lady Gaga last performed in Taiwan 13 years ago. She wrapped up four consecutive concerts at Singapore’s National Stadium last week also following a 13-year absence. Unlike her upcoming tour in July — which includes locations across the US, Europe and Australia — Singapore was chosen as Lady Gaga’s only stop in Asia. As a result, flights and hotel bookings in Singapore doubled, and the increased traffic greatly benefited the restaurant and retail industries. Local media reported that revenue reached S$200 million (US$155million).
Credit card spending data provides clear evidence of the overall economic benefits of hosting concerts in Kaohsiung. According to statistics from Mastercard, when Blackpink held their first concert in Kaohsiung in March 2023, spending on hotels in Zuoying District (左營), where the stadium is located, increased by 50 percent. In neighboring Nanzih District (楠梓), hotel industry revenue surged by an even greater margin of 170 percent.
Concerts are far more than just entertainment — they are powerful catalysts that boost the tourism, transportation, dining and retail industries, allowing vitality to flow into a city’s economy. The planning of transportation routes and crowd flow before and after concerts is a high-intensity test of urban governance. Such events effectively serve as comprehensive assessments of a local government’s physical infrastructure, organization and administrative capabilities, posing a challenge to elected officials.
As Kaohsiung’s concert economy takes off, some have criticized the city’s policy of waiving venue rental and commission fees. However, these critics cannot see the forest for the trees — they are so obsessed with rent and box office revenue that they overlook the widespread business opportunities and benefits to surrounding industries that these events bring.
The Singaporean government last year provided millions of US dollars in subsidies to secure exclusive concert dates by pop icon Taylor Swift. The move attracted fans from all over Southeast Asia, generating US$500 million in economic output in just one week. This reality highlights the outright absurdity in the notion that concerts lead to economic losses. In truth, robust infrastructure and streamlined administrative procedures are key to the success or failure of a city’s concert economy.
Concerts and major international sporting events are the most ideal ways to display a city’s competitiveness. If Taiwan hopes to measure up against major international cities such as Singapore, Seoul and Tokyo, it is time for local governments to take decisive action.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework