Two weeks after pulling back from the brink of all-out war, India and Pakistan are now racing to win over global opinion.
Both sides are sending delegations to global capitals to influence international perception of the conflict as tensions between the nuclear-armed rivals continue to simmer.
New Delhi this week dispatched seven teams of diplomats and lawmakers to capitals of about 30 countries, including in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa and South America, as part of its publicity campaign. The delegates have been told to detail Islamabad’s history of supporting militants and its alleged involvement in the deadly April 22 attacks in the India-administered part of Kashmir, the incident that triggered the latest conflict.
Illustration: Mountain People
India is also pushing back against the perception — reinforced by US President Donald Trump’s social media posts — that the two sides were equals in their dispute over the territory of Kashmir and that they had agreed to mediated peace talks.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday last week ruled out talks with Pakistan and vowed military action if faced with further terrorist attacks.
Separately, the Indian minister of foreign affairs told Dutch broadcaster NOS that the May 10 truce was negotiated directly between India and Pakistan, refuting Trump’s claim of brokering the ceasefire.
“For many Indians, Trump’s messaging on mediation amounts to drawing a false equivalence by treating India and Pakistan the same,” said Michael Kugelman, a South Asia analyst based in Washington. “This is a major setback for New Delhi, given that it amounts to a victory for Islamabad in the battle of narratives that has endured even after the fighting stopped.”
Pakistan is also planning its own diplomatic initiative, although on a much smaller scale. Its government has said it is sending seven officials to three European capitals and the US to make the case that it, not India, is the victim.
The dueling efforts are playing out almost two weeks after both countries agreed to a ceasefire, following days of intense airstrikes, including using drones, and artillery and small arms exchanges between the two nations. The fighting touched off after India blamed Pakistan for what it called a terrorist attack that killed 26 civilians, mostly Indian tourists. Pakistan denied responsibility.
Trump’s attempt to take credit for the ceasefire has frustrated Indian officials, as have his assertions that trade was used as a bargaining chip to negotiate the truce. New Delhi has denied those claims, as well as a statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio that the two sides agreed to begin talks on a broad set of issues at “a neutral site.”
In their diplomatic outreach, a main focus of the message from Indian officials will be Pakistan’s alleged links to terrorism and its purported involvement in the April 22 attack on civilians, said Rajeev Kumar Rai, a member of the Indian parliament who is part of a delegation visiting Spain, Greece, Slovenia and Russia.
The teams will specifically raise Pakistan’s alleged support for UN-designated terror groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, according to officials familiar with the outreach, who asked not to be identified because the discussions were private.
They will also inform foreign officials that India remains resolved to respond to violence in a manner it deems fit, they said.
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs did not immediately respond to an e-mail seeking further information.
Of the nations on India’s list to visit, roughly one-third are members of the Organization of Islamic Countries, a multilateral body that claims to speak for the Muslim world. Pakistan is also a member of that group and has lobbied it for greater intervention in the Kashmir conflict.
New Delhi also aims to target Pakistan’s economy, which is only beginning to recover from a prolonged crisis.
India plans to urge the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force to take renewed action against Pakistan, a government official said on Friday in New Delhi.
The anti-money laundering watchdog removed Pakistan from its terror-financing list in 2022, easing Islamabad’s access to trade and investments.
India wants Pakistan returned to the gray list, the official said.
For its part, Pakistan has said the goal of its outreach is to highlight what it says are its “consistent and constructive efforts to ensure peace and stability in the region,” according to the state-run Associated Press of Pakistan.
It said its officials will “expose India’s propaganda campaigns.”
The Pakistan officials will also bring up India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty — a critical water-sharing pact — that can have serious long-term consequences for Pakistan.
“Breaking the treaty at will is irresponsible behavior,” said Khurram Dastgir Khan, who is part of Pakistan’s delegation. “If the water issue is not solved, then we are looking at another war in six to 10 years.”
New Delhi suspended the treaty, which governs the distribution of waters from six rivers flowing from the Himalayas, after the Kashmir attacks.
“President Trump has demonstrated more openness to working with Pakistan than we saw under [former US] President [Joe] Biden, so this moment does represent a meaningful opportunity for Pakistan to reassert its relevance in Washington,” said Elizabeth Threlkeld, senior fellow and director of South Asia at the Stimson Center in Washington.
For India, the diplomatic effort is complicated by the fact that it continues to press ahead with trade talks with the US, which it hopes will remove Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs on the South Asian country’s exports.
“The challenge for policymakers in the US and New Delhi will be to navigate sensitivities over US mediation while continuing to make progress in other areas of the relationship, including trade and defense,” Threlkeld said.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS