On Tuesday, the Legislative Yuan approved the longest session extension in its history, lasting a full two months. That decision was made without any explanation. While prolonging a legislative session is not uncommon, doing so without transparency raises serious concerns about motives and accountability.
Last year’s extension into mid-July had a clear and legitimate purpose. With the administration of President William Lai (賴清德) newly in office, the Legislative Yuan needed to receive and review the executive branch’s policy agenda. That extension was logical and necessary. It honored the principle of democratic transition and allowed the new government to present its vision. This year, no such justification has been offered. If lawmakers truly need more time to handle urgent legislation, why not call an extraordinary session — a constitutionally authorized mechanism that requires a defined agenda? Why resort to an open-ended extension that evades public scrutiny?
What makes the decision more troubling is that many of the lawmakers who backed the extension are the same ones who rarely show up for executive interpellation.
A report by Citizen Congress Watch showed that the 10 legislators with the lowest oral interpellation rates in the previous session all voted in favor of the extension. They were all affiliated with either the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
The two opposition parties hold a legislative majority, giving them control over key procedures and schedules. With that power comes the duty to lead responsibly and transparently. Yet the rationale behind this year’s extension remains vague at best. Many of the lawmakers involved have a track record of skipping oversight sessions. Their sudden enthusiasm for extending legislative time raises a fair question: Is this truly about productivity, or is it a political maneuver?
There is a misunderstanding that legislative recess equals vacation. In truth, it is a period free from daily committee and floor meetings, offering lawmakers valuable time for other essential duties. These include visits to local districts, policy discussions with academics and experts, consultations with civil society groups and drafting legislation.
A recess also provides a critical window for parliamentary diplomacy. As China increases pressure to marginalize Taiwan internationally, legislators must represent Taiwan abroad. Earlier this year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) led a cross-party delegation to the US to attend US President Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony. In February, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) received an award at France’s Future Leaders Invitation Program, where he met with experts in aerospace and strategic policy. These initiatives help bolster Taiwan’s international relationships and visibility. They require time and careful planning, both of which become harder under an extended session.
By arbitrarily prolonging the legislative calendar, lawmakers risk displacing these meaningful efforts and losing opportunities for outreach and engagement in their constituencies.
Taiwanese welcome lawmakers who are willing to work harder for the public good, but that work must be rooted in transparency and have a clear purpose. This year’s session extension has neither. Without a stated rationale, it appears more like a delay tactic than a genuine effort to serve the public.
If KMT and TPP legislators truly intend to act in the public’s interest, it must begin with honesty. Otherwise, this extension would be seen not as public service, but as political evasion. The public deserves better.
Gahon Chiang is a congressional staff member in the office of DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting, focusing on Taiwan’s national security policy.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS