On Tuesday, the Legislative Yuan approved the longest session extension in its history, lasting a full two months. That decision was made without any explanation. While prolonging a legislative session is not uncommon, doing so without transparency raises serious concerns about motives and accountability.
Last year’s extension into mid-July had a clear and legitimate purpose. With the administration of President William Lai (賴清德) newly in office, the Legislative Yuan needed to receive and review the executive branch’s policy agenda. That extension was logical and necessary. It honored the principle of democratic transition and allowed the new government to present its vision. This year, no such justification has been offered. If lawmakers truly need more time to handle urgent legislation, why not call an extraordinary session — a constitutionally authorized mechanism that requires a defined agenda? Why resort to an open-ended extension that evades public scrutiny?
What makes the decision more troubling is that many of the lawmakers who backed the extension are the same ones who rarely show up for executive interpellation.
A report by Citizen Congress Watch showed that the 10 legislators with the lowest oral interpellation rates in the previous session all voted in favor of the extension. They were all affiliated with either the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
The two opposition parties hold a legislative majority, giving them control over key procedures and schedules. With that power comes the duty to lead responsibly and transparently. Yet the rationale behind this year’s extension remains vague at best. Many of the lawmakers involved have a track record of skipping oversight sessions. Their sudden enthusiasm for extending legislative time raises a fair question: Is this truly about productivity, or is it a political maneuver?
There is a misunderstanding that legislative recess equals vacation. In truth, it is a period free from daily committee and floor meetings, offering lawmakers valuable time for other essential duties. These include visits to local districts, policy discussions with academics and experts, consultations with civil society groups and drafting legislation.
A recess also provides a critical window for parliamentary diplomacy. As China increases pressure to marginalize Taiwan internationally, legislators must represent Taiwan abroad. Earlier this year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) led a cross-party delegation to the US to attend US President Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony. In February, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) received an award at France’s Future Leaders Invitation Program, where he met with experts in aerospace and strategic policy. These initiatives help bolster Taiwan’s international relationships and visibility. They require time and careful planning, both of which become harder under an extended session.
By arbitrarily prolonging the legislative calendar, lawmakers risk displacing these meaningful efforts and losing opportunities for outreach and engagement in their constituencies.
Taiwanese welcome lawmakers who are willing to work harder for the public good, but that work must be rooted in transparency and have a clear purpose. This year’s session extension has neither. Without a stated rationale, it appears more like a delay tactic than a genuine effort to serve the public.
If KMT and TPP legislators truly intend to act in the public’s interest, it must begin with honesty. Otherwise, this extension would be seen not as public service, but as political evasion. The public deserves better.
Gahon Chiang is a congressional staff member in the office of DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting, focusing on Taiwan’s national security policy.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS