The military confrontation between Pakistan and India put Pakistan’s economy at risk of being caught in the crossfire. Following a terrorist attack in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir, India launched a series of strikes on Pakistani territory. The crisis fueled concerns that India might try to halt the flow of the Indus River into Pakistan — a threat that Pakistan’s struggling economy would have ill afforded.
Five decades ago, Pakistan had the strongest economy in South Asia, outperforming India, Bangladesh and even Sri Lanka in terms of per capita income. Today, the opposite is the case: Pakistan’s per capita income is half that of its neighbors and it trails them in education, healthcare and most other development indicators.
While macroeconomic mismanagement has contributed to this decline, an often overlooked — but equally significant — factor is rapid population growth.
When population growth outpaces income growth, per capita income falls. The long-term consequences are far-reaching: a larger population — especially one with a high dependency ratio — means lower household savings, less investment and slower economic growth.
Pakistan’s population has more than quadrupled over the past half-century and 36 percent of its residents today are under 15 — far higher than the 22 to 25 percent share in Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka, where population growth has slowed dramatically in recent decades.
As a result, the share of working-age Pakistanis remains below 60 percent, compared with just over two-thirds in the rest of South Asia.
This demographic imbalance places immense strain on household savings. When earners are outnumbered by dependents, a society’s capacity to save diminishes. That helps explain why Pakistan’s domestic savings rate, at under 7 percent, is about 20 percentage points lower than in neighboring economies.
Southeast Asia’s demographic transition during the 1970s and 1980s suggests that, with a working-age population share comparable to other South Asian countries, Pakistan’s savings rate could have been 10 percentage points higher. That would have enabled far greater investment in infrastructure, education and industrial development, boosting GDP growth by 1 to 1.5 percentage points annually. Sustained over 25 years, these gains could have raised income levels by 30 to 45 percent — enough to close the gap with India and Bangladesh.
Pakistan’s investment rate has hovered around 15 percent — well below other South Asian economies — for decades. Although foreign aid and foreign investment have provided some support, they have done little to address the shortfall in domestic savings and capital formation. The result is a stagnant economy, prone to recurring crises whenever external financing dries up.
The country’s fiscal imbalances have compounded the problem. Today, nearly two-thirds of government revenue goes toward interest payments on debt, leaving little room for public investment or social spending. Efforts to finance deficits through domestic borrowing have crowded out private investment, further weakening growth.
Pakistan now finds itself at a crossroads. The IMF-supported stabilization program — up for IMF board review this week — has brought some macroeconomic relief after inflation surged to nearly 40 percent in 2023 and foreign-exchange reserves fell to a level that could barely cover three weeks of imports. Debt rollovers by official creditors and falling oil prices have also provided a temporary respite.
However, the social and political sustainability of the IMF’s prescribed austerity measures remains in serious doubt. Tax hikes have been fast-tracked, while social spending and investment have been severely constrained. Without new concessional financing, there is no fiscal space for meaningful economic transformation.
A more effective strategy would balance fiscal discipline with long-term development, focusing on three key areas. First, Pakistan must take steps to slow population growth. Expanding access to education — especially for girls — would enable women to enter the workforce, while improved family-planning services could help lower fertility rates.
Bangladesh offers a useful model: its population growth has slowed markedly as female education and employment have increased. Targeted microfinance loans for women have also played a major role. If Pakistan can follow its neighbors’ lead and increase the share of its working-age population by just 5 percentage points over the next decade, its savings rate would rise substantially, unlocking investment and long-term economic potential.
Second, the country must reform its tax system and improve compliance. Broadening the tax base — particularly in under-taxed sectors like retail and agriculture — and boosting tax collection could generate an additional 6 percent of GDP over the next six years. At least half of that revenue should be allocated to social spending and public investment. This is vital not only for sustaining economic growth, but also for maintaining public support for structural reforms.
Last, greater support from the international community is crucial. Coordinated concessional financing from multilateral and bilateral creditors could help bridge critical funding gaps. These funds should be earmarked for high-impact investments in education, healthcare, workforce development and climate-resilient infrastructure.
A demographic shift will not happen overnight, but the groundwork can be laid now. With the right combination of policies and international support, Pakistan can close the savings gap with its neighbors and facilitate the investments needed to revitalize its ailing economy.
Aasim M. Husain is a former deputy director of the Middle East and Central Asia Department at the IMF.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS