The military confrontation between Pakistan and India put Pakistan’s economy at risk of being caught in the crossfire. Following a terrorist attack in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir, India launched a series of strikes on Pakistani territory. The crisis fueled concerns that India might try to halt the flow of the Indus River into Pakistan — a threat that Pakistan’s struggling economy would have ill afforded.
Five decades ago, Pakistan had the strongest economy in South Asia, outperforming India, Bangladesh and even Sri Lanka in terms of per capita income. Today, the opposite is the case: Pakistan’s per capita income is half that of its neighbors and it trails them in education, healthcare and most other development indicators.
While macroeconomic mismanagement has contributed to this decline, an often overlooked — but equally significant — factor is rapid population growth.
When population growth outpaces income growth, per capita income falls. The long-term consequences are far-reaching: a larger population — especially one with a high dependency ratio — means lower household savings, less investment and slower economic growth.
Pakistan’s population has more than quadrupled over the past half-century and 36 percent of its residents today are under 15 — far higher than the 22 to 25 percent share in Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka, where population growth has slowed dramatically in recent decades.
As a result, the share of working-age Pakistanis remains below 60 percent, compared with just over two-thirds in the rest of South Asia.
This demographic imbalance places immense strain on household savings. When earners are outnumbered by dependents, a society’s capacity to save diminishes. That helps explain why Pakistan’s domestic savings rate, at under 7 percent, is about 20 percentage points lower than in neighboring economies.
Southeast Asia’s demographic transition during the 1970s and 1980s suggests that, with a working-age population share comparable to other South Asian countries, Pakistan’s savings rate could have been 10 percentage points higher. That would have enabled far greater investment in infrastructure, education and industrial development, boosting GDP growth by 1 to 1.5 percentage points annually. Sustained over 25 years, these gains could have raised income levels by 30 to 45 percent — enough to close the gap with India and Bangladesh.
Pakistan’s investment rate has hovered around 15 percent — well below other South Asian economies — for decades. Although foreign aid and foreign investment have provided some support, they have done little to address the shortfall in domestic savings and capital formation. The result is a stagnant economy, prone to recurring crises whenever external financing dries up.
The country’s fiscal imbalances have compounded the problem. Today, nearly two-thirds of government revenue goes toward interest payments on debt, leaving little room for public investment or social spending. Efforts to finance deficits through domestic borrowing have crowded out private investment, further weakening growth.
Pakistan now finds itself at a crossroads. The IMF-supported stabilization program — up for IMF board review this week — has brought some macroeconomic relief after inflation surged to nearly 40 percent in 2023 and foreign-exchange reserves fell to a level that could barely cover three weeks of imports. Debt rollovers by official creditors and falling oil prices have also provided a temporary respite.
However, the social and political sustainability of the IMF’s prescribed austerity measures remains in serious doubt. Tax hikes have been fast-tracked, while social spending and investment have been severely constrained. Without new concessional financing, there is no fiscal space for meaningful economic transformation.
A more effective strategy would balance fiscal discipline with long-term development, focusing on three key areas. First, Pakistan must take steps to slow population growth. Expanding access to education — especially for girls — would enable women to enter the workforce, while improved family-planning services could help lower fertility rates.
Bangladesh offers a useful model: its population growth has slowed markedly as female education and employment have increased. Targeted microfinance loans for women have also played a major role. If Pakistan can follow its neighbors’ lead and increase the share of its working-age population by just 5 percentage points over the next decade, its savings rate would rise substantially, unlocking investment and long-term economic potential.
Second, the country must reform its tax system and improve compliance. Broadening the tax base — particularly in under-taxed sectors like retail and agriculture — and boosting tax collection could generate an additional 6 percent of GDP over the next six years. At least half of that revenue should be allocated to social spending and public investment. This is vital not only for sustaining economic growth, but also for maintaining public support for structural reforms.
Last, greater support from the international community is crucial. Coordinated concessional financing from multilateral and bilateral creditors could help bridge critical funding gaps. These funds should be earmarked for high-impact investments in education, healthcare, workforce development and climate-resilient infrastructure.
A demographic shift will not happen overnight, but the groundwork can be laid now. With the right combination of policies and international support, Pakistan can close the savings gap with its neighbors and facilitate the investments needed to revitalize its ailing economy.
Aasim M. Husain is a former deputy director of the Middle East and Central Asia Department at the IMF.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS