Sovereignty a daily practice
I read with great interest Teo Hsia’s article (“Taiwan should learn from Canada,” May 6, page 8) comparing Taiwan’s situation with Canada’s. I strongly agree with the core message: Taiwan must stand firm in the face of external pressure.
In recent years, the Chinese Communist Party has persistently attempted to undermine Taiwan through diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, political infiltration and disinformation. These are not merely challenges to the nation’s governance — they are attacks on our sovereignty.
Taiwan is a fully functioning democracy and a sovereign state. We have every right — and responsibility — to resist foreign hostility. However, speeches and slogans alone are not enough. What we need is action: to maintain our unique advantages and shield our strategic assets.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co represents not just Taiwan’s technological prowess, but a critical piece in global supply chains. The government must act decisively to protect its intellectual property and prevent technology leaks — regardless of whether such actions are politically convenient.
We must ensure that, in a rapidly shifting global environment, Taiwan retains the strategic leverage to protect its people and interests.
Policies that secure our core industries are not acts of provocation — they are acts of preservation. Sovereignty is not just a principle; it is a daily practice.
Lee Yu-kuan
Taoyuan
Taiwan and economic shifts
Last month, US President Donald Trump signed Executive Order No. 14257, imposing a 32 percent “reciprocal” tariff on Taiwanese goods, with the semiconductor industry being the sole exception.
As Taiwan’s export industries have long heavily relied on the US market, this policy delivered a significant blow to the nation’s economy. Traditional manufacturing sectors, electronic components and machinery tools were particularly affected, as their competitiveness weakened, potentially leading to indirect impacts on employment and the survival of small and medium-sized enterprises.
The government refrained from imposing retaliatory tariffs in response. Instead, it proposed strategies such as expanding procurement from the US and negotiating a zero-tariff agreement, demonstrating its hope to resolve the dispute through talks.
To ease tensions, the US and Taiwan held their first substantive tariff negotiations in Washington early this month. These talks covered not only tariff issues, but also non-tariff trade barriers, indicating that both sides are still willing to engage in dialogue and repair their trade relationship.
As a university student about to graduate this year, I cannot help but worry whether this sudden trade conflict would affect my job-seeking process. Will the job market shrink due to pressure on export-oriented enterprises? Will our generation face greater employment challenges?
These concerns have begun to influence and reshape my expectations and plans for the future. What I once learned only from textbooks has now become a tangible source of pressure in daily life, making me realize that global political and economic shifts are no longer distant or abstract — they have real, significant impacts on small, open economies like Taiwan’s.
Overall, although this tariff dispute has brought harm to Taiwan’s economy, it also serves as a valuable international economic education for our generation. It not only reminds us of the importance of paying attention to global developments, but also teaches us to cultivate adaptability and a global perspective.
As the US is one of Taiwan’s largest export markets, any shift in its policies can have profound consequences. I hope the government and education system will strengthen education on international affairs, equipping everyone with the ability to analyze global trends and face future challenges with confidence.
Only by understanding the world can we remain steady and move forward in times of uncertainty.
Sung Yu-fang
Kaohsiung
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS