Sovereignty a daily practice
I read with great interest Teo Hsia’s article (“Taiwan should learn from Canada,” May 6, page 8) comparing Taiwan’s situation with Canada’s. I strongly agree with the core message: Taiwan must stand firm in the face of external pressure.
In recent years, the Chinese Communist Party has persistently attempted to undermine Taiwan through diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, political infiltration and disinformation. These are not merely challenges to the nation’s governance — they are attacks on our sovereignty.
Taiwan is a fully functioning democracy and a sovereign state. We have every right — and responsibility — to resist foreign hostility. However, speeches and slogans alone are not enough. What we need is action: to maintain our unique advantages and shield our strategic assets.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co represents not just Taiwan’s technological prowess, but a critical piece in global supply chains. The government must act decisively to protect its intellectual property and prevent technology leaks — regardless of whether such actions are politically convenient.
We must ensure that, in a rapidly shifting global environment, Taiwan retains the strategic leverage to protect its people and interests.
Policies that secure our core industries are not acts of provocation — they are acts of preservation. Sovereignty is not just a principle; it is a daily practice.
Lee Yu-kuan
Taoyuan
Taiwan and economic shifts
Last month, US President Donald Trump signed Executive Order No. 14257, imposing a 32 percent “reciprocal” tariff on Taiwanese goods, with the semiconductor industry being the sole exception.
As Taiwan’s export industries have long heavily relied on the US market, this policy delivered a significant blow to the nation’s economy. Traditional manufacturing sectors, electronic components and machinery tools were particularly affected, as their competitiveness weakened, potentially leading to indirect impacts on employment and the survival of small and medium-sized enterprises.
The government refrained from imposing retaliatory tariffs in response. Instead, it proposed strategies such as expanding procurement from the US and negotiating a zero-tariff agreement, demonstrating its hope to resolve the dispute through talks.
To ease tensions, the US and Taiwan held their first substantive tariff negotiations in Washington early this month. These talks covered not only tariff issues, but also non-tariff trade barriers, indicating that both sides are still willing to engage in dialogue and repair their trade relationship.
As a university student about to graduate this year, I cannot help but worry whether this sudden trade conflict would affect my job-seeking process. Will the job market shrink due to pressure on export-oriented enterprises? Will our generation face greater employment challenges?
These concerns have begun to influence and reshape my expectations and plans for the future. What I once learned only from textbooks has now become a tangible source of pressure in daily life, making me realize that global political and economic shifts are no longer distant or abstract — they have real, significant impacts on small, open economies like Taiwan’s.
Overall, although this tariff dispute has brought harm to Taiwan’s economy, it also serves as a valuable international economic education for our generation. It not only reminds us of the importance of paying attention to global developments, but also teaches us to cultivate adaptability and a global perspective.
As the US is one of Taiwan’s largest export markets, any shift in its policies can have profound consequences. I hope the government and education system will strengthen education on international affairs, equipping everyone with the ability to analyze global trends and face future challenges with confidence.
Only by understanding the world can we remain steady and move forward in times of uncertainty.
Sung Yu-fang
Kaohsiung
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS