Spain and Portugal on Monday went offline due to nationwide power fluctuations that spurred outages, impacting the entire Iberian Peninsula, its connection to the power grid in southwestern France, and Andorra in the Pyrenees mountains along the border between France and Spain.
The outages led to stoppages in traffic signals, halts to railway transit, the shutdown of information networks and hindering of medical center operations and ATM access. The Spanish government announced a state of emergency and launched its national security council emergency handling mechanism. The EU stated that the outage was the most serious European infrastructure crisis in the past year.
The outages are not just an event revolving around energy sources — they further reveal the structural weakness of Europe’s power grids under extreme climate conditions. Spain’s national power providers said that the outages were due to extreme fluctuations in the European power grid.
In one of these fluctuations, electricity generation equivalent to 60 percent of national demand dropped in five seconds, leading to cascading blackouts. Although the Iberian power grid is connected internationally with Morocco and France, and despite neighboring countries providing emergency power through auxiliary power supply networks, when the electricity provision network faced system failure, these connections were not enough to have an immediate effect.
Although Spain and Portugal are capable of fending off attacks and digital compromise by foreign actors, they launched a “potential terrorist attack” mechanism to conduct a criminal investigation, reflecting the need for contemporary homeland security to face off against the dual risk of physical destruction and data intrusions.
Spain’s and Portugal’s power grid failures are a pressure test for other countries’ contingency mechanisms and multinational coordination capabilities. Madrid immediately launched a contingency, starting with coordinating with police to maintain public order. The Spanish and Portuguese prime ministers activated a leadership hotline to coordinate with France, Germany and Italy to receive power grid technology support.
Meanwhile, both countries prioritized restoring electricity to medical centers and transit hubs. Spain’s military coordinated the mobilization of portable generators and vehicles to support airport and railway infrastructure, ensuring national basic infrastructure services were not fully knocked out.
During the blackouts, people flooded into stores to buy daily necessities, including flashlights and other emergency light sources, short-wave radios and other basic necessities. The latter demonstrates Spain’s high degree of insecurity concerning being cut off from basic information and echoes the EU’s late-March proposal to stock up on 72 months’ worth of strategic goods and materials.
We should not consider what happened in Spain and Portugal to be a black swan event, but rather a dress rehearsal in light of global climate extremes, and power grid and network connections.
Moreover, since Taiwan is an island with no multinational power grid support and no energy source backups, when we face threats from potential hostile military and digital threats, our risks are enormous. These risks show the importance of bolstering the defensive resilience of our power grid, as well as emplacing systems for risk rehearsals and evaluating compound disasters, such as compounded climate extremes, and disconnection from information and communications systems.
Tsai Yu-ming is an assistant professor in the School of Liberal Education at Shih Chien University.
Translated by Tim Smith
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS