In his victory speech early on Tuesday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney wasted little time calling for a dramatic reshaping of his government’s relationship with the US, saying that threats from US President Donald Trump cast doubt on Canada’s ability to function as a “free, sovereign, and ambitious” nation.
The former central banker and investment executive had for months focused his electoral campaign on the threats from Canada’s largest trading partner and longtime political ally.
Carney, a self-professed lover of policy mechanics, has pledged to redevelop Canada’s economy to reduce its reliance on the US — a daunting task, given that bilateral trade contributes to one-fifth of Canada’s GDP.
In what should have been a celebratory address, he took on a somber tone as he considered the end of the affair.
“Our old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over. The system of open global trade anchored by the United States — a system that Canada has relied on since the second world war, a system that while not perfect has helped deliver prosperity for a country for decades — is over,” he said.
He also called for national unity, cognizant of the geographic and political frictions that had until recently, suggested Canadians would elect a Conservative government.
“My message to every Canadian is this: No matter where you live, no matter what language you speak, no matter how you voted, I will always do my best to represent everyone who calls Canada home,” Carney said.
Along with external pressure from Trump, Canada still faces a raft of unresolved internal tensions: a housing shortage, amplified by high immigration levels and the spiralling cost of living, has left voters increasingly frustrated and distrustful of the Liberal Party.
Carney has pledged to use the power of government to combat the interlocking crises, telling supporters that his ministers could “do things previously thought impossible at speeds we haven’t seen in generations.”
“The point is is that we can give ourselves far more than the Americans can ever take away,” he said.
The prime minister expects to have a call with Trump in the coming days, a senior Liberal said, and would begin negotiations on a new trade agreement.
“He is treating his upcoming meeting like he did debate prep during the election: preparing for all possible scenarios,” the source said. “Because he doesn’t know which version of the president he might get.”
There is little doubt Canada is at an economic and political crossroads, and Carney must navigate competing visions for the country’s future trajectory.
“The big question is how much [the] Canadian federal government wants to pursue closer relations with the United States,” said Peter Morrow, an associate professor of economics at the University of Toronto. “The challenge for Canada is that it’s not really in a good position to diversify away too much from its economic relationship with United States. Geography just makes it an obvious trading partner, and if you diversify too much, then it’s almost like you’re trying to pull a Brexit.”
However, Canadian officials face a challenge in revisiting a trade agreement previously negotiated with Trump in his first term, Morrow said.
“What sorts of concessions do you make in an agreement with a partner who’s shown that they’re willing to throw those agreements out the window?” he asked.
In the past few weeks, Canadians have engaged in economic nationalism, boycotting US goods and encouraging fellow citizens to seek out domestic options to supplant imports.
“Everything we know is that companies that engage in global transactions tend to be more productive than companies that don’t. This nationalist turn inward for Canada is really not a good idea,” Morrow said. “What Canada should be doing is trying to buy from Europe, engage with a wider array of trading partners and resisting the temptations of economic nationalism.”
Morrow points to recent discussions in Canada on whether to continue with the purchase of US-made F-35 jets, knowing that the US might be an “unreliable partner” in the future. Critics of the multibillion-dollar deal with Lockheed Martin have suggested that Canada instead examine offers from European defense manufacturers.
In his election night speech, Carney hinted at a goal of strengthening relations with like-minded allies in Europe. The technocratic Liberal leader, who previously served as governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, has been eager to burnish his global credentials.
In his brief, nine-day tenure as prime minister before calling a snap election, he met French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Carney’s defensive positioning of Canada’s economy and political alliances would be on display in June, when he hosts leaders from G7 countries in the province of Alberta.
Juliette Theoret, a University of Ottawa student of defense policy who attended Carney’s victory party, said the prime minister won her vote by pitching a vision of the country that involved less reliance on its longtime ally.
“Before Trump, I don’t think national security and national sovereignty were big topics of conversation, and without him, there’s a good chance the election would have swayed in a different direction,” she said. “But threats of [making Canada the] 51st state, and this idea of not having a border between Canada and the US — that really pushed people to unite.”
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
RSS