The Food and Drug Administration has permanently removed its recommendation that companies conduct tests on animals to establish bone health claims for marketing food and beverage products sold in Taiwan.
This is the fifth health claim regulation that the agency has scrapped clean of animal tests. Coming after a push from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and hearing from more than 28,000 PETA supporters, this decision exemplifies the global shift in animal testing.
The agency had previously recommended that experimenters cut out the ovaries of mice, rats or hamsters and feed the animals a calcium-deficient diet to induce osteoporosis, feed or force-feed them the test food, and then kill and dissect them.
These cruel, painful and useless experiments have never held any meaning for human health.
These amended regulations now only accept human tests, the gold standard of human nutrition research. Instead of cutting up and killing animals, researchers could also use computer modeling and artificial intelligence, organs-on-a-chip, and many more human-relevant techniques to study human nutrition. This is the future and the future is here.
Companies such as Taiwan Sugar that fail to recognize we are well into the 21st century would be left behind. As cutting-edge tech takes over institutionalized inertia, those companies that stop relying on useless animal experiments, including Barilla, Ferrero and Unilever, would be the leaders in their fields.
Taiwan has taken a progressive step forward and must continue to adopt advanced testing methods across the board.
Caring consumers would continue to buy products not tested on animals and to call for a continued shift to modern methods.
Jason Baker is a senior vice president for PETA Asia.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS