The Food and Drug Administration has permanently removed its recommendation that companies conduct tests on animals to establish bone health claims for marketing food and beverage products sold in Taiwan.
This is the fifth health claim regulation that the agency has scrapped clean of animal tests. Coming after a push from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and hearing from more than 28,000 PETA supporters, this decision exemplifies the global shift in animal testing.
The agency had previously recommended that experimenters cut out the ovaries of mice, rats or hamsters and feed the animals a calcium-deficient diet to induce osteoporosis, feed or force-feed them the test food, and then kill and dissect them.
These cruel, painful and useless experiments have never held any meaning for human health.
These amended regulations now only accept human tests, the gold standard of human nutrition research. Instead of cutting up and killing animals, researchers could also use computer modeling and artificial intelligence, organs-on-a-chip, and many more human-relevant techniques to study human nutrition. This is the future and the future is here.
Companies such as Taiwan Sugar that fail to recognize we are well into the 21st century would be left behind. As cutting-edge tech takes over institutionalized inertia, those companies that stop relying on useless animal experiments, including Barilla, Ferrero and Unilever, would be the leaders in their fields.
Taiwan has taken a progressive step forward and must continue to adopt advanced testing methods across the board.
Caring consumers would continue to buy products not tested on animals and to call for a continued shift to modern methods.
Jason Baker is a senior vice president for PETA Asia.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS