The photograph looks old at first. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Sean Lien (連勝文) sits next to China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤). There is a sense of familiarity and warmth within the shot, but it also carries an indescribable chill. Some people opened the link thinking it was a retrospective report — after all, it is a bit hard to believe such a meeting could take place now.
The photograph was taken just days ago.
The public meeting was neither impromptu nor unique. It was representative of the KMT’s ideological shift over the past two decades from being anti-communist to pro-communist while acting as if nothing had changed. Many had hoped that people within the party would debate or even resist such behavior. Instead, there is only silence. They have altered the language, redefining “exchange” as “peace” and regarding “peace” as a matter of course.
There are several facets to address when discussing the KMT’s directional shift:
First is the party’s organizational culture. An organization that grew under an authoritarian regime naturally has a limited tolerance for internal dissent. Even after democratization, people within the party remained accustomed to obedience and suppression.
Second is the party’s chronic shift in language strategy. From Lien’s visit to China, former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) negotiations over the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) last year to this week’s photo — each move was made under the guises of “peace” and “pragmatism.” This is a kind of linguistic anesthesia, a disguise the KMT has used to fool itself and others.
Third is the tacit understanding of the party’s power structure. In the KMT’s local organizations, those who control the resources are the ones who survive. Practical considerations sweep over ideology, interests trump values — no one wants to sacrifice their political future by opposing pro-communist behavior.
At a deeper level is the KMT’s misunderstanding of its own failure. After losing power in 2000, it failed to reflect on the weight of its past authoritarianism, and the growing distance between itself and the public, instead attributing its loss to “too strong an anti-China stance.” This led the KMT to embrace China as a means of survival.
Finally, there is the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) long-term plan for the KMT. It has used soft-power tactics to coax, pacify and envelop the party. The KMT was not forced to align itself with the CCP — it gradually adapted, eventually coming to enjoy the validation.
It is clear that Lien’s trip to China was a product of the system. He did not deviate from the KMT’s path — he represents it. His smile and silence echo the party’s stance.
To this day, no one within the KMT has publicly condemned the trip, nor is anyone willing to distance themselves from the meeting. There is only a widespread calmness, as if the meeting is simply another normal news report.
However, Taiwanese know that it is much more than a political choice — it is also a loss. A political party has lost its sense of identity, its historical memory and its ability to hold itself accountable to its supporters.
The photo of Lien and Song continues to circulate online, but it is no longer just a piece of news — it is visual proof of a soul departed, a Victorian death photograph, a memento mori. The KMT might continue to shout: “Republic of China,” but the sound of its marching is becoming fainter by the day, moving further away.
This is not only betrayal, but also forgetfulness.
Liu Che-ting is a writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS