Every Easter, Christians remember how at the Last Supper, on the eve of Jesus’ crucifixion, hope seemed to be lost. Most of Jesus’ closest friends were about to deny and desert him. All that lay ahead was torture and a hideous death. In this moment of despair, Jesus made himself a gift for all, giving bread to the disciples and saying: “This is my body given for you.” This act of hope extended into Easter morning, when life triumphed over death, love over hatred, and divine giving over human grasping.
As we mourn the death of Pope Francis, our hope following this Easter Sunday is that even the smallest acts of kindness could bear fruit beyond our imagining. When faced with 5,000 hungry people, all the disciples could muster were five loaves of bread and a couple of fish, but it was enough to feed everyone, with the blessing of the Lord of the harvest.
Our world is plagued by poverty and violence — problems that seem impossible to solve — at a time when the postwar global order is in danger of collapse. Christian charities — Catholic Relief Services, World Vision, Samaritan’s Purse and the Jesuit Refugee Service come to mind, among many others — are playing an admirable role in helping alleviate this suffering. When so many people have no hope for the future, these charities’ efforts globally are fundamental to our faith.
That role would become even more important in the coming years, as major economies cut their foreign-aid budgets, inflicting profound damage on vulnerable people, each one made in the image of God. Boston University’s new digital tracking initiative estimates that the near-total freeze on US foreign-aid funding and programming since January has already resulted in the deaths of more than 68,000 adults and more than 142,000 children.
Judaism and Islam also insist that charitable giving is essential to a life of faith, rather than an optional extra. The word “charity” comes from the Latin caritas, which means “love.” In that sense, charities express what is fundamental to our human dignity: the ability to give freely and to receive gifts without shame.
True, some aid can be patronizing and humiliating, imprisoning people in a culture of dependence. However, this is not how most of these charities work. Instead, they recognize that the most vulnerable and fragile among us bear witness to oft-forgotten aspects of human dignity: resilience, solidarity, mutual dependence, trust in God and each other, and gratitude. Jesus says that whoever reaches out to “one of the least of these” gives to him.
To turn away from the poorest is to reject God. Above all, aid sustains family life, especially the women and children whom it should be unthinkable to abandon. Nikolai Berdyaev, the Russian existentialist philosopher, wrote: “Bread for myself is a material question; bread for my neighbor is a spiritual question.” For Christians, the ultimate act of giving is shown in Christ’s shedding of his blood on the cross. For all of us, whether religious or not, charity is life-giving blood, which circulates in the body of society, nourishing life with its kindness.
Given this, recent reports that the US government might impose new curbs on charitable giving are profoundly worrying. The ability of charities, funders and philanthropies to operate and deliver support unhindered in the US and globally is vital not only to those who benefit from aid, but also to those who give it. A society in which charitable giving is deliberately restricted would be doomed to poverty itself, both financial and moral.
Pope Francis devoted his life to serving the poor and tackling injustice. His final Easter Urbi et Orbi message is worth reflecting on: “I appeal to all those in positions of political responsibility in our world not to yield to the logic of fear which only leads to isolation from others, but rather to use the resources available to help the needy, to fight hunger, and to encourage initiatives that promote development.”
Hope, faith and charity are the foundational virtues of Christianity. Although many of us were running low on hope this Easter, our faith remains strong, as must our common commitment to charity.
Timothy Radcliffe, the first Englishman to be elected Master of the worldwide Dominican Order in its 800-year history, was created Cardinal by Pope Francis on Dec. 9 last year.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS