A series of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led recall efforts have come under fire following revelations of widespread forgery in the signature-gathering process. The most staggering case involves 1,923 forged signatures attributed to deceased people. On average, each campaign backed by the KMT contained more than 100 falsified entries — pointing not to isolated errors, but to a coordinated and systemic operation.
Despite the seriousness of the fraud, the KMT has neither apologized nor launched an internal investigation. One KMT legislator even dismissed the issue, remarking: “At most, it’s just forgery — is it really that serious?” That flippant response speaks volumes.
According to statistics, the KMT-led recall targeting a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator included 1,923 signatures from deceased people. By contrast, a civic-led recall effort against a KMT legislator included only 12 such cases. That is a 160-fold difference.
That is no clerical error — it is a criminal act. Under Article 210 of the Criminal Code, and articles 79 and 83 of the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), forged signatures on recall petitions must be struck from the record, and such an offense can result in up to five years in prison.
It is simple: Dead people cannot sign petitions. To argue otherwise is to insult the public’s intelligence — and break the law.
The irony is hard to ignore. Late last year, the KMT championed an amendment to Article 98-1 of the Public Officials Election and Recall Act, demanding tougher penalties for using personal data to forge signatures. The party warned the public not to take such fraud lightly.
Now? When the KMT’s youth wing is implicated in the most serious signature scandal to date, the KMT tries to downplay it as no big deal.
The scandal also reveals two starkly different approaches to political mobilization: The recall movement against the KMT lawmaker was initiated by civic organizations, with the DPP providing support during the second stage; in contrast, the recall targeting the DPP lawmaker was coordinated from the top down by the KMT — with party headquarters, legislators, local branches, public officials and the youth wing in full coordination.
What should be a democratic tool for public accountability has been co-opted into a partisan weapon. Instead of spontaneous grassroots action, we are seeing orchestrated political retaliation.
Because of the scale of the forgery, prosecutors and court staff have had to divert time and energy to verify fake data — time that could have been spent on real cases affecting the public good.
That is more than a legal headache — it is a costly waste of limited judicial resources.
The KMT appears to have misinterpreted the message sent by voters on Jan. 13 last year. What Taiwanese demanded was accountability, and checks and balances — not political warfare. Turning the mass recall movement into a battlefield for grudges only weakens public trust in the whole system.
A legislative majority is not a blank check to rewrite rules, twist facts or sidestep responsibility. It is a test of political maturity — a chance to lead with integrity and hold those in power accountable. So far, the KMT seems stuck in a pattern of denial, blame and cover-ups.
If they keep dodging the truth and refusing to take responsibility, the backlash will come — because while the dead cannot sign a petition, the living can still vote.
Gahon Chiang is a staff member for Legislator Kuan-Ting Chen, focusing on national security policy. He holds a master’s in international relations from National Taiwan University and serves as a youth representative to the Taichung City Government.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
RSS