Today is UN Chinese Language Day, a celebration honoring the richness of the Chinese script. The date was chosen to coincide with guyu (“grain rain”), a traditional solar term (half-month seasonal division) starting on April 20 when ancient Chinese paid tribute to Cangjie (倉頡), the legendary figure credited with inventing Chinese characters about 5,000 years ago.
Legend has it that when Cangjie created the characters for writing, millet grains rained from the sky and the ghosts and gods wept at night — a poetic testament to the profound cultural significance of Chinese writing.
Yet, in English, this monumental writing system remains shackled to an inadequate term: “Chinese characters.” Unlike cuneiform (“wedge-shaped”) or hieroglyphics (“sacred carvings”) — names that evoke the distinct essence of ancient scripts — “Chinese character” is vague, impersonal and oddly detached from its cultural roots. The word “character” is ambiguous in itself — it could refer to a person’s traits, a fictional role, something’s characteristics, or a symbol used in writing or printing.
Chinese script deserves a term that reflects its uniqueness.
I propose a linguistic reclamation: Let us adopt “hanzi” as the standard English term, casting aside the imprecise placeholder we have tolerated for too long.
Japanese writing has its native terms — kanji (derived from hanzi, 漢字), hiragana and katakana. The Korean Hangul, although unique, was designed with hanja (hanzi) as its reference. Even cuneiform and hieroglyphics are named with reverence for their origins. Why, then, must the script that inspired them all remain obscured behind the generic veil of “Chinese character”? It is as if we insisted on calling kanji “Japanese symbols” or hieroglyphics “Egyptian letters” — a disservice to their cultural and historical significance.
This is also a question of identity. The term hanzi is direct, authentic and resonant — just as kanji and Hangul are for their respective scripts. An alternative, sinograph (from the Greco-Latin Sino for “Chinese” and graph for “writing”), exists in academic circles, but its clinical tone renders it ill-suited for everyday use. Hanzi, by contrast, carries the warmth of tradition and the clarity of linguistic pride.
I urge academics, translators and cultural advocates to join this call. Let “hanzi” stand as the primary term, with “sinograph” serving where academic precision is needed, and “Chinese character” fading into supplementary explanation.
Words shape perception. Let ours, at last, do justice to one of humanity’s greatest intellectual achievements.
Hugo Tseng has a doctorate in linguistics, and is a lexicographer and former chair of the Soochow University English Department.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
RSS