When a severe rice shortage sent prices skyrocketing in Japan last year, Tokyo restaurant owner Arata Hirano did what had once seemed unthinkable: He switched to a US variety.
The price of the Californian Calrose rice he buys has doubled since his first purchase last summer, but even so it is far cheaper than home-grown grains.
“Unless domestic prices fall below Calrose prices, I don’t plan to switch back,” said Hirano, whose restaurant offers meal sets of fish, rice, soup and sides.
His willingness to embrace foreign rice might presage a seismic change in mindset for Japanese businesses and consumers — one that could allow Tokyo leeway to relax some restrictions if rice becomes a thorny topic in tariff talks with US President Donald Trump, who has called out Japan’s high levies on its staple grain.
Wholesale prices for domestic rice have surged about 70 percent over the past year to hit their highest levels since current records began in 2006. Crops were hit by extreme heat while a tourism boom has added to demand. Worries abound that not much will change this year.
With inflation also raising the cost of living, businesses are now betting that a nation of people known for their discerning palates and pride in their staple grain is open to change.
Supermarket giant Aeon last week began selling an 80-20 American-Japanese blend that is about 10 percent cheaper than domestic rice after a test sales-run proved a hit. Fast-food chain Matsuya and restaurant operator Colowide began serving pure US rice this year. At supermarket chain Seiyu, Taiwanese rice has been flying off the shelves since last year.
It is a sharp contrast to 1993, when the Thai rice the Japanese government imported during an acute shortage was largely shunned, leaving supermarkets with piles of unsold bags.
Rare shortages aside, for most of the past six decades, nearly all of Japan’s so-called staple rice — which is consumed at meals as opposed to rice used for feed or ingredients in other products — has been home-grown. There has not been much need for imports while high tariffs, put in place to ensure Japanese self-sufficiency for its most basic food, have protected local farmers from competition.
Japan limits tariff-free “minimum access” imports of staple rice to 100,000 tonnes a year, or about 1 percent of total consumption. The US accounted for roughly 60 percent of that amount last fiscal year, trailed by Australia, Thailand and Taiwan. Anything above that is subject to a levy of ￥341 (US$2.39) per kilogram.
When Trump announced sweeping tariffs on much of the world this month, he lambasted Japan for what he said was a 700 percent tariff on rice, a reference to that levy. Japanese policymakers called his remarks on the sensitive topic “regrettable.” They also dispute the 700 percent figure, saying it is based on outdated international rice prices.
It is unclear, however, just how much — if at all — rice will be discussed in bilateral tariff negotiations that began this week. Some analysts think Trump’s Republican administration might not be focused on rice as exports to Japan come from California, a Democratic-leaning state. Nor is it clear how much Japan might be willing to yield in opening up its rice market.
In one sign that there might be room for some change, a panel advising the Japanese Ministry of Finance on Tuesday proposed expanding imports of staple rice, saying that lifting the 100,000 tonne tariff-free cap could help stabilize supply.
That said, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Liberal Democratic Party is unlikely to risk angering farmers, traditionally a strong support base, ahead of upper house elections in July.
“It’s not possible to make big concessions on rice just before the elections,” said Junichi Sugawara, senior fellow at Tokyo-based Owls Consulting Group.
What is clear is that supply remains an issue.
In the fiscal year that ended in March, tariff-free imports of staple rice hit Japan’s 100,000 tonnes cap for the first time in seven years.
The amount of tariffed imports, while still tiny, also jumped, quadrupling in the first 11 months of fiscal 2024 to just under 1,500 tonnes.
And this year, rice importer Kanematsu is shipping in its first large-scale purchase of US staple rice, 10,000 tonnes worth.
“We’re receiving many inquiries from the restaurant industry, convenience stores, supermarkets and rice wholesalers,” a Kanematsu spokesperson said.
In the week to April 6, Japanese supermarket rice prices hit an average of ￥4,214 per 5kg, marking their 14th straight week of increase and more than double the same period a year earlier. That is despite a rare release of rice from the government’s emergency stockpiles that started last month and is set to continue every month through July.
As for the quality and taste of imported rice, Miki Nihei, a customer at Hirano’s restaurant, Shokudou Arata, said she had no complaints and was surprised to learn it was not Japanese.
“I had no idea,” she said. “I have no qualms about eating imported rice. Prices have gone up, so I’m always looking for cheaper options.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS