Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump’s administration released the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance” document detailing its national defense plans, the Washington Post reported. The document outlined how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama Canal. It also said that stopping a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan must be prioritized, requiring US military deployments to be reassessed with a greater focus on the Indo-Pacific region.
Although still in draft form, the document signals a significant shift in the Pentagon’s priorities compared with the 2022 National Defense Strategy. It also aligns closely with Trump’s objectives, including a sharp focus on China.
To the public, Trump might seem like an old-school imperialist bent on disrupting the international order with his claims to want to “take over” foreign territory such as the Panama Canal, Greenland and Canada. However, his words were anything but a madman’s rhetoric — they were based on careful calculation and planning.
Greenland has been geopolitically important to the US and NATO allies since the Cold War. The shortest route for Russian missiles targeting the US is over the arctic and Greenland. As a result, Greenland serves as a crucial line of defense against missile threats and submarine activities in the arctic region.
On the issue of the Panama Canal, Trump wrote that “wonderful soldiers of China” were “lovingly, but illegally, operating the Panama Canal.” One of the reasons for this statement was that Panama’s two biggest ports, Cristobal and Balboa — at either end of the canal — have been operated by a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings since 1997. Beijing’s influence over Hong Kong-based companies means it could restrict US naval and commercial ship access in the event of a conflict.
With China stepping up its influence around the globe, it is evident that Trump is fully aware of the dangers that its strategic deployments pose and that he intends to cut off the tentacles of Chinese expansionism. While his “mad” claims have been ratcheting up global tensions, his actions have the goal of deterring Beijing and gaining greater strategic leverage over the semiconductor industry.
On the issue of the Russia-Ukraine war, as the US shifts its focus to defense of the US homeland and the China challenge, Trump would reduce US forces in Europe by having NATO members and European countries shoulder a greater share of their defense burden. Washington is offloading security responsibilities onto its allies to focus on the more pressing issue of China.
In response to the White House document, China launched military drills around Taiwan to deter “Taiwanese independence” forces. With the US tightening the screws, Beijing finds itself running out of allies and has resorted to using Taiwan as its only bargaining chip.
Taiwan is caught between two superpowers, but this painful predicament helps keep it secure. After all, both superpowers know how much is at stake and what launching a war would mean.
However, Taiwanese should not rejoice that the US is making Taiwan a priority, because it probably indicates that the US believes the possibility of an invasion has risen.
The government and the public should unite and bolster the nation’s defense capabilities. With the US and other allies around the world pushing back against communist forces, Taiwanese should stand alongside the democratic front.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS