This Tomb Sweeping Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) returned to his hometown to pay respects to his ancestors, using the occasion to indirectly accuse the Democratic Progressive Party of forgetting its roots and betraying Chinese culture. Since it appears Chu has confused the three concepts of a political regime, a nation and culture, let us talk about it.
My ancestors arrived in Taiwan’s Mingjian (名間) during the reign of the Qing emperor Kangxi (康熙) and settled around Bagua Mountain (八卦山). My family has lived in Taiwan for 10 generations.
My founding ancestor at the time lived in the matriarchal society of the indigenous Pingpu, and many of my maternal ancestors were also Pingpu.
After more than 300 years of bloodline integration and deep-rooted settlement, Taiwan has long been my and my family’s motherland. The land across the Taiwan Strait could only be defined as the land where my early ancestors once lived, during the Qing Dynasty, which has absolutely no connection to the present-day People’s Republic of China.
In terms of Chinese culture, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) carried out the Cultural Revolution in 1966 — true Chinese culture was destroyed many years ago. This is why China uses simplified characters, while Taiwan has preserved the use of traditional characters. It is Taiwan — not the CCP — that has continued to promote Chinese culture.
Furthermore, Taiwanese inherited more than just China’s Central Plains Culture — we also integrated with Austronesian, immigrant and maritime cultures, resulting in an inclusive, expansive and magnificent culture of our own.
Chu’s first blind spot is that he fails to recognize Taiwan’s diverse culture, instead insisting on respecting Chinese culture alone. His second blind spot is that he equates Chinese culture with the CCP regime, the party responsible for its destruction. His third blind spot is that he refuses to cherish Taiwan — the nation that gave him his roots — rather, he inexplicably longs for communist China and adds fuel to the fire by growing closer to the vultures that govern there.
Chu accused others of forgetting their roots, playing games with the descendants of the Yan and Huang emperors — a reference to the inheritors of Han Chinese culture — and mixing up the concepts of a political regime, a nation and culture.
He identifies with the CCP regime, yet shows no gratitude or recognition for the land, the nation or the citizens of the place that raised him. It is clear that he is the one with ulterior motives.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo. Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more
RSS