We all know that social media algorithms elevate material that you would engage with — typically content designed to enrage. However, one instant last week felt like a reprieve when, following the release of a new OpenAI image-creation tool with few guardrails, suddenly everything was decked out in the telltale style of the Japanese animation studio. Why it went viral is anyone’s guess. It seems to have begun with an innocuous tweet noting the brownie points attainable by converting family photos into Ghibli style. GPT-4o can of course do other styles; it could just as easily have been shots redone in the style of One Piece, The Muppets or Rick and Morty.
However, the people demanded Ghibli and, within hours, everything that could be Ghiblified had been. Perhaps the reason it took off is the sheer coziness of its world, particularly amid a frantic global environment where old friendships are falling apart, and a rapidly changing economy with artificial intelligence (AI) at its fore. The Ghibli images add a layer on reality that renders the mundane magical. In most of the studio’s movies, even the villains are understandable, and who among us has not wanted to ride the Catbus from My Neighbor Totoro or seek comfort in the onigiri (rice balls) from Spirited Away.
Another reason it exploded is surely the juxtaposition of Ghibli’s dreamlike world onto real-life horrors. Some of the most darkly funny and widely shared uses of the filter were the most tasteless, from a Ghibli assassination scene of former US president John F. Kennedy to the Ghibli Joseph Stalin in the infamous photo from which the purged Nikolai Yezhov was removed.
Of course, it did not last long. Such trends are only interesting so long as they remain organic: It was bad enough when OpenAI CEO Sam Altman changed his profile picture to a cartoon version, but once the White House account tweeted a picture of a Ghibli US President Donald Trump slapping handcuffs on a weeping fentanyl dealer the trend had already gone from whimsical to cringe, in less than 48 hours.
Hot on its heels was a backlash from artists. Complaints ran the gamut, from legitimate concerns about future employment prospects and complaints about the wealthy using the tool instead of commissioning a human artist, to a head-scratching theory that AI art itself is inherently fascist.
Many noted that Hayao Miyazaki, the genius responsible for the studio’s most iconic work, would not approve. Yet his well-known quote on AI art, in which he seems to declare it “an insult to life itself,” is often taken out of context. Miyazaki was speaking specifically about a demonstration showing AI animating creepy, zombie-like characters with missing limbs, which he felt insulted disabled people. However, in the same documentary, he does mutter that the demonstration made him feel that “we are nearing the Earth’s last day.” While he has not publicly commented on the recent trend (assuming he is even aware of it), it is a fair supposition that he would not approve, at least when it comes to the imagery being used by the White House.
Yet the knee-jerk reaction that conflates all AI work with slop seems overdone. Do not get me wrong: I despise the grifting bros who two years ago were flogging ape non-fungible tokens; the fake accounts that mindlessly regurgitate artificially generated drivel and the engagement farmers that abuse it.
However, like any other tool, AI art can be used for good or ill. For every tasteless White House tweet there was someone getting joy from the technology. Even if Miyazaki is no fan, he did integrate computer animation tools into his studio after a long period of opposition. Studio Ghibli even released a fully 3D-animated movie in 2020, directed by Miyazaki’s son, Goro, although it looks like a bad 1990s video game cutscene, and was received about as well. Nonetheless, computer animation itself greatly expands our ability to turn vision into reality, and studios such as Pixar have shown how to imbue it with soul — which is the thing missing from the worst attempts at art.
There are lots of gray areas, but I hesitate to jump to conclusions. Art style cannot generally be copyrighted — ChatGPT would make almost anything Ghibli-ish, but it would not draw Totoro, at least not without some workarounds. Japan’s laws around AI scraping are tremendously permissive, as Bloomberg Opinion columnist Catherine Thorbecke has said. Perhaps the creators might bring some legal cases, but if anything, this whole episode has been a free advertisement, demonstrating the strength of their brand. The online Ghiblis would fade, if they have not already, but as the critics note, the studio’s work carries far more depth than what amounts to little more than an advanced Snapchat filter.
In any case, that tech is not going back in the box. AI art certainly has implications for artists and animators, just as automation has in the past come for bank tellers or travel agents, typists and toll-booth operators. That those jobs are not creative does not mean they do not matter, and likewise creative work is not a uniquely protected category. Japan has a crippling lack of animators, who work long hours for little pay. If AI tools can help alleviate that, it should be welcomed.
That pace of technological change is another thing that rattles our brains, and ultimately it is precisely because the world is so full of such uncertainty that we looked to Ghibli — to briefly let us inhabit a simpler, more comforting one.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences