Tomorrow is the US’ big tariff day, when US President Donald Trump is set to announce reciprocal levies to address rising US trade deficits. Trump said he aims to increase tariffs on imports from all countries to match the rates they charge on US goods. The calculation for the tariffs includes not only the countries’ tariff rates, but also their non-tariff barriers, such as subsidies to industries, regulations, value-added taxes, exchange-rate policies, and intellectual property protection and enforcement.
Taiwan could be among the White House’s “dirty 15,” or countries with the highest trade surpluses with the US, that the Trump administration targets for reciprocal tariffs. Last year, Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US surged 83 percent year-on-year to US$73.9 billion — the seventh-largest in the world behind China, the EU, Mexico, Vietnam, Ireland and Germany, US customs data showed. Taiwan’s electronic components industry, including semiconductors, and the computer, electronic and optical products industry are at the highest risk of facing reciprocal tariffs, as they constitute the nation’s major exports to the US.
While the US might offer some relief from the levies to countries that engage in trade and investment talks that Trump views as favorable to the US, not all can be negotiated away. Trump’s economic agenda aims not only to reduce US trade deficits and revitalize US manufacturing, but to also make up for a shortfall in revenue due to the US president’s plans to cut taxes.
Uncertainties are likely to linger after tomorrow’s announcement, as Trump could expand his tariff list or raise rates whenever he deems fit during his second term through 2028. On the other hand, retaliatory measures from other countries appear to be much heavier and broader based on the US tariffs that have been announced thus far, as the White House’s prime targets are more prepared than during his first administration. As a result, the uncertainty surrounding global trade is expected to last longer than expected, along with significant economic implications as heated trade disputes carry on.
The final tariff outcome and the implications of the levies still hinge on negotiations between Taiwan and the US, as well as the strategies the government and businesses take to navigate the trade risks. Economics and finance officials have in the past few weeks emphasized that the effects of Trump’s tariff policy on Taiwan would be manageable and that the government is confident about the nation’s economic growth and inflation outlook. Still, they acknowledged external uncertainties from tariffs and key policies of major economies, as well as geopolitical events that could weigh on global growth.
While government officials have pledged to expand Taiwan’s export markets, enhance supply chain resiliency and boost investment in the US to address Trump’s tariff policy, efforts to maintain sound cost structures, create flexible business models and move up the value chain are equally important for local firms to sail through the trade uncertainties. However, as the rules of international trade have changed and the principles of promoting the free flow of capital and goods across borders are under growing threat of protectionist measures, Taiwanese firms must consider more non-economic factors in their operations.
Another critical factor for Taiwanese businesses is intermediate goods that are sourced from Mexico, Southeast Asia and South America, assembled into final products and shipped to the US. That has been a “China Plus One” investment strategy for firms to realign supply chains and avoid overconcentration on China over the past few years. It is under the spotlight, as the Trump administration threatens to impose high tariffs on those goods as well. While promoting more investment in the US, the government and businesses still need to respond to potential geopolitical challenges, and the risks of technology outflow and industrial chain disruption.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS