Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards.
She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of China.”
I sincerely share Chhabra’s disappointment and annoyance at Yeoh’s tendentious post, as we both feel genuine respect and affection for Taiwan.
However, I also think that lashing out at a well-beloved international star — however justifiably — is not the way to go.
Yeoh’s post came just after she had said, while in Taipei: “I do love this country very much,” but before she begins shooting her next film in China. This shows that she understands perfectly well that words have consequences and that she has weighed them carefully: Keeping her Chinese fans and financiers happy is worth more — a lot more — than not angering or losing her Taiwanese audience.
The “punishment” Chhabra suggests would mean little to her, as she has made up her mind.
That is why actor John Cena bent over backward in an embarrassing video a few years ago to apologize to his Chinese fans for calling Taiwan “a country.” For some people, a lot of people, money always trumps principles and intellectual honesty.
Worse, such a reaction against the Malaysian actress would risk making Taiwan look petty and resentful in front of the international public, which cares little about the subtleties of language with regards to sovereignty claims.
“Michelle Yeoh banned from Taiwan” is a headline that Beijing would love to read and turn viral. There is such a thing as bad publicity, after all, and it is the kind that Taiwan should strive to avoid.
Besides, banning and vetoing people for saying things it dislikes is China’s go-to response in situations like this, which is perfectly coherent with its dim view of human rights and civil liberties. Taiwan must not play that game; it is beneath its democratic convictions and unworthy of its respect for personal freedom.
On the contrary, Taiwan should publicly welcome Yeoh to come back and craft its invitation in ways that reflect, for all those around the globe who might not have been paying attention, what this nation is and China is not. That would make her look bad if she refuses the invitation and Taiwan look good if she accepts.
Invite her to do what, then? From the top of my head, to see a place where people can freely elect their leaders and criticize them without fear of reprisal; where their grievances and social demands can be heard by an independent judiciary; where they can use the Internet and social media as they wish without an army of censors; where no hukou (戶口, household registration permits) is required to relocate; where they can have as many (or as few) children as they want; where they are not constantly monitored by the government and given “social credit” scores; where they can express their opinions and their sexuality with no restrictions; and where they can inform themselves about their country and the world though a free press. The list could go on.
Sadly, I am pretty sure Yeoh is well aware of all this and much more. Not cool, Michelle, not cool.
Marcel Oppliger is a Chilean journalist and writer living in Taipei. He is the former opinion editor of newspapers Diario Financiero, La Tercera and La Segunda in Santiago, and the author of three non-fiction books.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS