We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power.
According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to countries, political entities or groups that advocate the use of non-peaceful means to endanger the sovereignty of the Republic of China.”
To have that definition and to not mention that the only country it could substantially refer to is the People’s Republic of China (PRC) runs against all good sense. There has been a reluctance to state the obvious in official discourse. This reluctance is not unrelated to the fact that the relationship between Taiwan and China is intentionally kept vague for ideological reasons.
Now, President William Lai (賴清德) has officially identified the PRC as a foreign hostile force, and this return to common sense opens the door to a change in how the China threat could be addressed. We can drop the pretense that Beijing has the best interests of “Taiwanese compatriots” at heart. Taiwan can finally start getting serious about mobilizing a whole-of-society approach to thwart the ambitions of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and its “united front” efforts.
Even the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), so ideologically wed to the idea that the ROC still represents China in any meaningful way, cannot object to the characterization of the PRC, the CCP or the PLA as a foreign hostile force.
The KMT objects to overt expressions of China as the enemy, because it does not want to provoke the CCP or the PLA. It is true that it is unwise to taunt the tiger prowling around the village; at the same time, if you understand the reason that the beast is circling, it is equally unwise to ignore it, or to leave morsels at the village border. That tiger would not leave until it has been fed.
Instead of listening to disappointed complaints about a lack of discipline or loyalty within the armed forces, or treasonous activity, Lai is preparing to reinstate military courts and place constraints on travel to and activities within China.
Civil servants at all levels, including borough wardens, would need to disclose their trips before traveling to China. At the same time, anyone found to have been engaged in Beijing’s “united front” work would be denied entry for participating in such activities.
Taiwanese artists would need to be aware of the pitfalls regarding damaging Taiwan’s national dignity while pursuing their careers in China.
There is an awareness that the government needs to take a tool out of the CCP’s playbook and mobilize culture for soft power to counteract Beijing’s attempts to distort the narrative.
Lai has said that the government should formulate plans to enhance cultural competitiveness on the international stage, and to encourage the study of Taiwanese history and culture. Taiwan could learn from the experience of South Korea and the soft power dividends that K-pop has brought the nation.
In terms of hard power, the army is now on the fourth day of “immediate combat readiness drills,” based on the assessment that the PLA could pivot military exercises around Taiwan to an actual invasion attempt.
Officially naming the CCP as a foreign hostile force would hopefully consolidate a whole-of-society awareness of the threat that was previously less well-defined.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS