India’s next election is still four years away, but battle lines are already getting drawn in the country’s more prosperous south.
M.K. Stalin, the improbably named chief minister of Tamil Nadu, is trying to mobilize his neighbors against what he perceives as a grand plan by northern politicians, led by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu right-wing party, to extend their hegemony.
The trigger for the pushback is the Modi government’s decision to revise regional representation in the national parliament with updated population data. Such a reshuffle could erode the south’s political relevance, despite its higher per capita income, greater investment success and superior track record on education and health.
Ostensibly, the purpose of the exercise is to have each lawmaker represent about the same number of electors. While that is a good organizing principle for any democracy, there was a valid reason why India put a 25-year moratorium on the practice by amending its Constitution in 1976. Back then, the biggest priority was to control explosive population growth.
It made no sense to reward regions that were making more babies with higher representation. Modi’s own party, when it was in power in 2001, extended the freeze to next year.
As the long-delayed reset finally gets underway after a new census, the south might lose big.
The combined parliamentary strength of the five southern states — Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana — could slide by 26 seats, or a fifth of the current total of 129, analysts have said.
That would help the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Even after winning three consecutive national elections, the BJP has only 29 lawmakers from the south in the 545-member parliament. Not one of the 240 seats it won in last year’s polls was from Tamil Nadu.
Modi’s government has denied that electoral redistricting has a political motive. Indian Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah has promised that the south would not lose any seats.
However, then more constituencies might need to be created in the north, bulking up the size of parliament.
Either way, the progressive part of India might end up with a smaller say over national affairs compared with Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, collectively referred to as “BIMARU,” a pejorative Hindi word for sick.
That would be unfair. After all, it was the south that empowered women with education and jobs, crunching fertility rates to below levels required for population replacement. As a result, those states today face an emerging labor shortage. Meanwhile, women are still having three or more babies in some parts of India’s north, where there is little job creation and poverty rates are often at sub-Saharan levels.
The regional disparities, instead of dissipating over time, are growing. A child born in Kerala has a better chance of surviving to age five than in the US. In Uttar Pradesh, the odds are worse than in Afghanistan.
The South believes it has already paid more than its fair share to help the north catch up. The taxes it generates are liberally redirected by the federal government to the north: Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state, gets more federal tax revenue than all of the south.
However, the resource transfers are failing to check the divergence in their performance. The fast-growing southern region fears that it would be punished again — and this time, fatally — by taking away its political voice.
What damage might a loss of representation do? The big worry is that the Modi government or its successor would continue to weaponize tax resources to make the south more like the north. For instance, New Delhi has refused to release nearly US$230 million in education funds until Tamil Nadu, which has always only mandated Tamil and English in its schools, accepts a new federal policy that requires three languages to be taught.
Stalin has said he would not bow to any pressure to force Hindi — a predominantly north Indian language — on a people who rejected such an imposition even under British colonial rule in 1938. (After India’s independence in 1947 there were also anti-Hindi agitations and riots.)
Superficially, it is a battle about the best use of scarce resources: hire Hindi teachers or pay for a new science lab? Deep down, there is serious economic misgiving. Why should Tamil Nadu, with per capita income of US$3,800, burden its kids with the language of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, which are three to five times poorer?
Being forced to do so might be “antithetical to our performance,” said P Thiaga Rajan, Tamil Nadu’s minister for information technology and digital services, in a recent interview with The Wire.
“Now if you say we’re not even going to have representation, it drives me into a panic,” he added.
The south’s rejection of the BJP’s Hindu-majoritarian politics is crucial, and not just for regional politicians like Thiaga Rajan and his boss, Stalin. Rahul Gandhi’s Congress Party, the main national opposition, has lost most of its sway in the north and west to Modi’s relentless rise, but it is in power in two southern states.
Modi’s third term in power might be the 74-year-old prime minister’s last, but not necessarily his party’s.
While the administration in New Delhi is distracted by US President Donald Trump’s trade disputes, sputtering domestic demand and falling stock prices, the BJP is still determined to win. After all, the decadal census scheduled for 2021 was never conducted, even though the COVID-19 pandemic, the original reason behind the delay, is long over.
As commentators have speculated, that is perhaps because new data for redistricting must come from a population count taken after next year. A big change in India’s electoral map could make the 2029 polls moot — the contest might be over even before the first vote is cast. That is the genesis of the nation’s brewing southern discomfort.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. Previously, he worked for Reuters, the Straits Times and Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS