Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), used her online accounts to openly advocate for “reunifying [China with] Taiwan through military force.”
As a result, the National Immigration Agency (NIA), citing risks of endangering national security and social stability, revoked her dependency-based residency permit under Article 14 of the Measures for the Permission of Family-based Residence, Long-term Residence and Settlement of People from the Mainland Area in the Taiwan Area (大陸地區人民在台灣地區依親居留長期居留或定居許可辦法).
Ironically, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is renowned for suppressing freedom of speech, has publicly supported this proponent of military unification under the pretence of “defending free speech.”
However, can advocating military unification be protected by freedom of speech? Consider this — if the CCP were to launch a military attack to forcibly invade Taiwan, Taiwanese would face immeasurable losses of life and property.
If advocating for unification with Taiwan through military force is considered exercising free speech, that would be equivalent to endorsing the CCP’s use of force to indiscriminately kill Taiwanese, treating Taiwanese lives as insignificant and viewing the nation’s soil as something to be trampled upon at will.
Such assertions are a significant threat to Taiwan.
Whether through peaceful unification, military unification or any other strategy, the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan would have the same outcome — the loss of Taiwan’s free speech as it exists today. Hong Kong serves as a vivid reminder of this.
Advocating for military unification is ultimately a call to dismantle Taiwan’s freedom of speech. Speech that seeks to destroy free speech has no right to be protected.
Taking a step back, if unifying with Taiwan through military force is as wonderful as Liu — who even nicknamed her daughter “Little Danggui” (小當歸), an affectionate nickname for Taiwanese children in China that is seen as symbolizing the idea of unification — claims, then she should be delighted about returning to the “motherland” now that the NIA has revoked her residency.
Returning to the motherland should be a joyous occasion, so why would Liu oppose the NIA’s decision?
Some prominent, pro-CCP pan-blue camp figures have even voiced sympathy and support for Liu — how odd.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a graduate degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS