New Taipei City Deputy Mayor Liu Ho-jan (劉和然) in an interview said that he hoped the next mayor of New Taipei City could reinvigorate the city by establishing a municipal university — a proposal that overlooks the challenges of an aging population and the declining number of educators and teaching professionals.
First, amid a declining birthrate, Taiwan is this year set to become a “super-aged society,” in which one in five people would be older than 65. As such, universities are facing school mergers, downsizing or closures. How, then, could Liu believe that a municipal university is what New Taipei City residents need?
Liu would do well to take a look at the case of National Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Hwa Hsia Campus in Jhonghe District (中和), which amid plummeting enrollment applied to close in recent years and is set to shut down permanently within two years.
In Tamsui District (淡水), Aletheia University — one of Taiwan’s oldest institutions, originally founded as Oxford College — has struggled with student enrollment, with registration rates failing to exceed 60 percent over the past three years. This academic year, it recorded the nation’s lowest enrollment rate, with only 30 percent of accepted students registering for classes.
Despite the ongoing crisis facing higher education institutions in New Taipei City, Liu still seems eager to establish another university — even as student enrollment continues to decline.
Moreover, running an academic institution requires deep pockets, and using taxpayer money for such a venture would only put further strain on resources. That could intensify competition and potentially squeeze small and medium-sized institutions out of existence.
This is particularly worrying given that several smaller schools in New Taipei City’s remote areas are in greater need of financial support from the city’s education department, while several infrastructure projects have been initiated for political gain or to curry public favor.
Education should not become another reckless form of pork-barrel spending or a cash grab that undermines young people’s right to quality education.
Lai Yen-cheng is a graduate student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS