Article 103 of the Criminal Code states: “Any person colluding with a foreign state or its agent with intent that such state or other state start war against the Republic of China [ROC] shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. An attempt to commit an offense specified in the preceding paragraph is punishable. Any person preparing or conspiring to commit an offense specified in paragraph 1 shall be sentenced to imprisonment not less than three years but not more than ten years.”
Article 104 states: “Any person colluding with a foreign state or its agent with intent to subject territory of the Republic of China to such state or other state shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. An attempt to commit an offense specified in the preceding paragraph is punishable. Any person preparing or conspiring to commit and offense specified in paragraph 1 shall be sentenced to imprisonment not less than three years but not more than ten years.”
Advocating for China’s forced military unification with Taiwan clearly carries the intent of encouraging China to initiate war against Taiwan. It carries the intent to make the territory currently governed by Taiwan belong to China.
Both of these are serious crimes explicitly outlined in Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code: “Treason.” The acts do not necessarily need to be fully realized — it constitutes a crime so long as there is “intent.”
Within the regulations outlined in the “Treason” chapter of the Criminal Code, Article 115-1 states: “The offense set forth in this chapter shall also apply to offenses committed in Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, or any hostile foreign forces, or to the agents thereof. The offender who violates any provision of this chapter shall be punished in accordance with such provision.”
Therefore, these regulations also apply to such acts committed within or involving China, Hong Kong, Macau and any hostile foreign forces or their agents.
Clearly, China’s intent to use military force to unify with Taiwan classifies it as a “foreign hostile force.”
Furthermore, “collusion” was legally defined in the 1984 Supreme Court Ruling No. 2364, which states that the communication of intent that defines collusion is not limited to prior planning — the communication of shared criminal intent at the time of the act also constitutes collusion.
Moreover, the method by which this intent is expressed does not need to be explicit. A tacit agreement between parties is also sufficient. In other words, the legal grounds for “collusion” could be established whether such an agreement occurs prior to or during the act, or is made explicitly or implicitly.
Making statements in support of China unifying Taiwan through military force — if done under the instructions of or in coordination with China’s “united front” organizations or their agents, or in an agreement to act as an internal accomplice — could be classified as having made an explicit or implicit agreement.
Thus, such actions constitute the offense of treason as defined by the Criminal Code.
Li Chin-i is head prosecutor at the Taichung Branch of the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS