Article 103 of the Criminal Code states: “Any person colluding with a foreign state or its agent with intent that such state or other state start war against the Republic of China [ROC] shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. An attempt to commit an offense specified in the preceding paragraph is punishable. Any person preparing or conspiring to commit an offense specified in paragraph 1 shall be sentenced to imprisonment not less than three years but not more than ten years.”
Article 104 states: “Any person colluding with a foreign state or its agent with intent to subject territory of the Republic of China to such state or other state shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. An attempt to commit an offense specified in the preceding paragraph is punishable. Any person preparing or conspiring to commit and offense specified in paragraph 1 shall be sentenced to imprisonment not less than three years but not more than ten years.”
Advocating for China’s forced military unification with Taiwan clearly carries the intent of encouraging China to initiate war against Taiwan. It carries the intent to make the territory currently governed by Taiwan belong to China.
Both of these are serious crimes explicitly outlined in Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code: “Treason.” The acts do not necessarily need to be fully realized — it constitutes a crime so long as there is “intent.”
Within the regulations outlined in the “Treason” chapter of the Criminal Code, Article 115-1 states: “The offense set forth in this chapter shall also apply to offenses committed in Mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, or any hostile foreign forces, or to the agents thereof. The offender who violates any provision of this chapter shall be punished in accordance with such provision.”
Therefore, these regulations also apply to such acts committed within or involving China, Hong Kong, Macau and any hostile foreign forces or their agents.
Clearly, China’s intent to use military force to unify with Taiwan classifies it as a “foreign hostile force.”
Furthermore, “collusion” was legally defined in the 1984 Supreme Court Ruling No. 2364, which states that the communication of intent that defines collusion is not limited to prior planning — the communication of shared criminal intent at the time of the act also constitutes collusion.
Moreover, the method by which this intent is expressed does not need to be explicit. A tacit agreement between parties is also sufficient. In other words, the legal grounds for “collusion” could be established whether such an agreement occurs prior to or during the act, or is made explicitly or implicitly.
Making statements in support of China unifying Taiwan through military force — if done under the instructions of or in coordination with China’s “united front” organizations or their agents, or in an agreement to act as an internal accomplice — could be classified as having made an explicit or implicit agreement.
Thus, such actions constitute the offense of treason as defined by the Criminal Code.
Li Chin-i is head prosecutor at the Taichung Branch of the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS